These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1135 related items for PubMed ID: 9081275

  • 1. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Distortion product of otoacoustic emissions in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss].
    Schlögel H, Stephan K, Böheim K, Welzl-Müller K.
    HNO; 1995 Jan; 43(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 7890546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A, Suckfüll M, Schneeweiss S, Schorn K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Determining the cause of hearing loss: differential diagnosis using a comparison of audiometric and otoacoustic emission responses.
    Mills DM.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):508-25. PubMed ID: 16957501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical investigation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE) in 447 ears.
    Kuroda T.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2007 Mar; 34(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 17116381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Changes in otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency hearing thresholds in children and adolescents.
    Groh D, Pelanova J, Jilek M, Popelar J, Kabelka Z, Syka J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb; 212(1-2):90-8. PubMed ID: 16364580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Specificity and sensitivity of transient click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)].
    Pröschel U, Eysholdt U.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Aug; 74(8):481-8. PubMed ID: 7575899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Assessment of cochlear function with distortion products of otoacoustic emissions in acoustic neuroma].
    Oeken J.
    HNO; 1996 Dec; 44(12):677-84. PubMed ID: 9081952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Transitory evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with cerebellopontile angle tumors].
    Pröschel U, Eysholdt U, Berg M.
    HNO; 1994 Apr; 42(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 8021159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Vonthein R, Zenner HP.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) in chronic noise-induced hearing loss--recommendations for expert assessment].
    Oeken I, Müller H.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Aug; 74(8):473-80. PubMed ID: 7575898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T, Kandzia F, Oswald JA, Janssen T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An objective method of analyzing cochlear versus noncochlear patterns of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in patients with acoustic neuromas.
    Telischi F.
    Laryngoscope; 2000 Apr; 110(4):553-62. PubMed ID: 10763999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW, Kochanek K, Trzaskowski B, Pilka E, Skarzynski PH, Skarzynski H.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 57.