These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 9083326

  • 1. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Wears RL, Delke I, Gaudier FL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):633-42. PubMed ID: 9083326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Misoprostol for labor induction in women with term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis.
    Lin MG, Nuthalapaty FS, Carver AR, Case AS, Ramsey PS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 106(3):593-601. PubMed ID: 16135593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert: a meta-analysis.
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I, Gaudier FL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 2):878-83. PubMed ID: 10546777
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Buser D, Mora G, Arias F.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr; 89(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 9083316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG, Tedesco RP, Pires HM, Calderon IM, Faúndes A.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006 Apr; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D, Brown D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL, Farmer RM, Dean CA, Carpenter ME.
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.
    Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM, Delke I.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 11777525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
    Owolabi AT, Kuti O, Ogunlola IO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Ogburn PL, Harris DY, Heise RH, Ramin KD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, Yeomans ER.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.