These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

800 related items for PubMed ID: 9083935

  • 1. The influence of cigarette consumption and smoking machine yields of tar and nicotine on the nicotine uptake and oral mucosal lesions in smokers.
    Andersson G, Vala EK, Curvall M.
    J Oral Pathol Med; 1997 Mar; 26(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 9083935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A study to evaluate the effect on Mouth Level Exposure and biomarkers of exposure estimates of cigarette smoke exposure following a forced switch to a lower ISO tar yield cigarette.
    Shepperd CJ, Eldridge AC, Errington G, Dixon M.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec 01; 61(3 Suppl):S13-24. PubMed ID: 21672597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Self-regulation of smoking intensity. Smoke yields of the low-nicotine, low-'tar' cigarettes.
    Djordjevic MV, Fan J, Ferguson S, Hoffmann D.
    Carcinogenesis; 1995 Sep 01; 16(9):2015-21. PubMed ID: 7554048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Nicotine yield from machine-smoked cigarettes and nicotine intakes in smokers: evidence from a representative population survey.
    Jarvis MJ, Boreham R, Primatesta P, Feyerabend C, Bryant A.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Jan 17; 93(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 11208883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Would a medium-nicotine, low-tar cigarette be less hazardous to health?
    Stepney R.
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Nov 14; 283(6302):1292-6. PubMed ID: 6794825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mouth level smoke exposure using analysis of filters from smoked cigarettes: a study of eight countries.
    Mariner DC, Ashley M, Shepperd CJ, Mullard G, Dixon M.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec 01; 61(3 Suppl):S39-50. PubMed ID: 20510323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A survey of mouth level exposure to cigarette smoke in the United States.
    Nelson PR, Chen P, Dixon M, Steichen T.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2011 Dec 01; 61(3 Suppl):S25-38. PubMed ID: 20937343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Oral mucosal changes and nicotine disposition in users of Swedish smokeless tobacco products: a comparative study.
    Andersson G, Björnberg G, Curvall M.
    J Oral Pathol Med; 1994 Apr 01; 23(4):161-7. PubMed ID: 8046653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The changing cigarette, 1950-1995.
    Hoffmann D, Hoffmann I.
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Mar 01; 50(4):307-64. PubMed ID: 9120872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Chinese 'low-tar' cigarettes do not deliver lower levels of nicotine and carcinogens.
    Gan Q, Lu W, Xu J, Li X, Goniewicz M, Benowitz NL, Glantz SA.
    Tob Control; 2010 Oct 01; 19(5):374-9. PubMed ID: 20507920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship between cigarette format and mouth-level exposure to tar and nicotine in smokers of Russian king-size cigarettes.
    Ashley M, Dixon M, Prasad K.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Oct 01; 70(1):430-7. PubMed ID: 25146962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The relationship between smoking machine derived tar yields and biomarkers of exposure in adult cigarette smokers in the US.
    Mendes P, Liang Q, Frost-Pineda K, Munjal S, Walk RA, Roethig HJ.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct 01; 55(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 19481578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The tar reduction study: randomised trial of the effect of cigarette tar yield reduction on compensatory smoking.
    Frost C, Fullerton FM, Stephen AM, Stone R, Nicolaides-Bouman A, Densem J, Wald NJ, Semmence A.
    Thorax; 1995 Oct 01; 50(10):1038-43. PubMed ID: 7491550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of the yields of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide of 36 brands of Canadian cigarettes tested under three conditions.
    Rickert WS, Robinson JC, Young JC, Collishaw NE, Bray DF.
    Prev Med; 1983 Sep 01; 12(5):682-94. PubMed ID: 6657634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature.
    Scherer G.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1999 Jul 01; 145(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10445368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Similar uptake of lung carcinogens by smokers of regular, light, and ultralight cigarettes.
    Hecht SS, Murphy SE, Carmella SG, Li S, Jensen J, Le C, Joseph AM, Hatsukami DK.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar 01; 14(3):693-8. PubMed ID: 15767351
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Estimation of mouth level exposure to smoke constituents of cigarettes with different tar levels using filter analysis.
    Hyodo T, Minagawa K, Inoue T, Fujimoto J, Minami N, Bito R, Mikita A.
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec 01; 67(3):486-98. PubMed ID: 24113618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of measured and FTC-predicted nicotine uptake in smokers.
    Byrd GD, Robinson JH, Caldwell WS, deBethizy JD.
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Nov 01; 122(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 8848540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 40.