These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 9084283

  • 1. Observers' use of image enhancement in assessing caries in radiographs taken by four intra-oral digital systems.
    Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jan; 25(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9084283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of lossy image compression on accuracy of caries detection in digital images taken with a storage phosphor system.
    Wenzel A, Gotfredsen E, Borg E, Gröndahl HG.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Mar; 81(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 8653470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems.
    Berkhout WE, Verheij JG, Syriopoulos K, Li G, Sanderink GC, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 May; 36(4):204-10. PubMed ID: 17536087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A, Svanaes DB, van der Stelt PF, Gröndahl HG, Wenzel A, van Ginkel FC, Kullendorff B, Hintze H, Larheim TA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Ludlow JB, Phillips C.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs.
    Wenzel A, Fejerskov O, Kidd E, Joyston-Bechal S, Groeneveld A.
    Caries Res; 1990 Jan; 24(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 2261604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of two compression algorithms and the detection of caries.
    Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, Sanderink GC.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jul; 31(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 12087443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Relationship between histological and radiographic caries lesion depth measured in images from four digital radiography systems.
    Jacobsen JH, Hansen B, Wenzel A, Hintze H.
    Caries Res; 2004 Jul; 38(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 14684975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of the number of iterative restorations on tuned aperture computed tomography for approximal caries detection.
    Abreu M, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Nortjé CJ.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Nov; 30(6):325-9. PubMed ID: 11641731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions.
    Nascimento EH, Gaêta-Araujo H, Vasconcelos KF, Freire BB, Oliveira-Santos C, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180100. PubMed ID: 29851369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
    Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H, Mikkelsen L, Mouyen F.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Nov; 72(5):621-6. PubMed ID: 1745523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Detection of non-cavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth.
    Haiter-Neto F, dos Anjos Pontual A, Frydenberg M, Wenzel A.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Sep; 12(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 18210170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of noise on the compressibility and diagnostic accuracy for caries detection of digital bitewing radiographs.
    Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC, Geraets WG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 10202472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K, Nakayama E, Shimizu M, Goto TK, Chikui T, Kawazu T, Okamura K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.