These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

260 related items for PubMed ID: 9092222

  • 1. [Perioperative evaluation of internal carotid artery stenoses: value of multislab MR angiography].
    Vogl TJ, Kutter RW, Schön K, Juergens M, Hepp W, Balzer JO, Steger W, Felix R.
    Zentralbl Chir; 1996; 121(12):1023-32. PubMed ID: 9092222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Stenosis-occlusion of the carotid bifurcation. Angiography with MR and contrast media versus digital angiography].
    Scarabino T, Carriero A, Balzano S, Sciannelli V, Bonomo L, Salvolini U.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Mar; 95(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 9638160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis.
    Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS.
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of apparent internal carotid occlusion on ultrasound: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Hammond CJ, McPherson SJ, Patel JV, Gough MJ.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 35(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 18262445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media in the study of carotid arteries].
    Catalano C, Laghi A, Pediconi F, Fraioli F, Napoli A, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2001 Apr; 101(1-2):54-9. PubMed ID: 11360754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [MR-angiography and duplex-ultrasonography: predictive reliability for angiographically determined internal carotid artery stenosis >/= 70-99%].
    Wölfle KD, Schnur C, Pfadenhauer K, Bruijnen H, Bohndorf K, Loeprecht H.
    Zentralbl Chir; 2002 Feb; 127(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 11894206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading.
    Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R, Strada L, Righi C, Politi LS, Kirchin MA, Chiesa R, Scotti G.
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):204-13. PubMed ID: 15955853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Berg F, Bangard C, Bovenschulte H, Hellmich M, Nijenhuis M, Lackner K, Gossmann A.
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
    U-King-Im JM, Trivedi R, Cross J, Higgins N, Graves M, Kirkpatrick P, Antoun N, Gillard JH.
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 15041456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging.
    Clevert DA, Johnson T, Michaely H, Jung EM, Flach PM, Strautz TI, Clevert DA, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):379-86. PubMed ID: 16920314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.