These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 9093191

  • 1. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in predicting fertility outcome?
    Mol BW, Swart P, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F.
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Apr; 67(4):663-9. PubMed ID: 9093191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The capacity of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy to predict natural conception.
    Verhoeve HR, Coppus SF, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Hompes PG, Bourdrez P, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Collaborative Effort on the Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive Medicine.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Jan; 26(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 21088018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome.
    Mol BW, Collins JA, Burrows EA, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM.
    Hum Reprod; 1999 May; 14(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 10325270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, Kleiman-Broeze KA, Traas MAF, Muijsers GJJM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, van Oostwaard MF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Peters HE, Lier MCI, Lambalk CB, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May 09; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prognostic significance of diagnostic laparoscopy for spontaneous fertility.
    Mol BW, Swart P, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Feb 09; 44(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 10853436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Radionuclide hysterosalpingography is not predictive in the diagnosis of infertility.
    Lundberg S, Wramsby H, Bremmer S, Lundberg HJ, Asard PE.
    Fertil Steril; 1998 Feb 09; 69(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 9496331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prognostic capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy to predict spontaneous pregnancy.
    van Tetering EA, Bongers MY, Wiegerinck MA, Mol BW, Koks CA.
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Apr 09; 22(4):1091-4. PubMed ID: 17234678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Tubal flushing with oil-based or water-based contrast at hysterosalpingography for infertility: long-term reproductive outcomes of a randomized trial.
    van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, Pham CT, Verhoeve HR, Hoek A, de Bruin JP, Nap AW, van Hooff MHA, Goddijn M, Hooker AB, Bourdrez P, van Dongen AJCM, van Rooij IAJ, van Rijnsaardt-Lukassen HGM, van Golde RJT, van Heteren CF, Pelinck MJ, Duijn AEJ, Kaplan M, Lambalk CB, Mijatovic V, Mol BWJ.
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Jul 09; 114(1):155-162. PubMed ID: 32553471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hysteroscopy, hysterosalpingography and tubal ostial polyps in infertility patients.
    Lee A, Ying YK, Novy MJ.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jun 09; 42(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 9219120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The limited value of hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal status and fertility potential.
    Karande VC, Pratt DE, Rabin DS, Gleicher N.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Jun 09; 63(6):1167-71. PubMed ID: 7750583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Are patient characteristics associated with the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal pathology? An individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Van Geloven N, Coppus SF, Collins JA, Den Hartog JE, Van der Linden PJ, Marianowski P, Ng EH, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Strandell A, Van der Veen F, Mol BW.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2011 Jun 09; 17(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21147835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Screening strategies for tubal factor subfertility.
    den Hartog JE, Lardenoije CM, Severens JL, Land JA, Evers JL, Kessels AG.
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Aug 09; 23(8):1840-8. PubMed ID: 18579509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J, Pham CT, Dreyer K, Verhoeve HR, Hoek A, de Bruin JP, Nap AW, Wang R, Lambalk CB, Hompes PGA, Mijatovic V, Karnon JD, Mol BW.
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Sep 09; 110(4):754-760. PubMed ID: 30196973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Role of treatment with ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination in women with unilateral tubal occlusion diagnosed by hysterosalpingography.
    Farhi J, Ben-Haroush A, Lande Y, Fisch B.
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Aug 09; 88(2):396-400. PubMed ID: 17445812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K, Out R, Hompes PG, Mijatovic V.
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep 09; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of fallopian tubes in infertile women].
    Bacevac J, Ganović R.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001 Sep 09; 129(9-10):243-6. PubMed ID: 11928602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Chlamydia trachomatis IgG seropositivity is associated with lower natural conception rates in ovulatory subfertile women without visible tubal pathology.
    Coppus SF, Land JA, Opmeer BC, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ, Hompes PG, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F, Mol BW, van der Steeg JW.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Nov 09; 26(11):3061-7. PubMed ID: 21926058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hysterosalpingographic Findings of Infertile Patients Presenting to Our Reproductive Endocrinology Department: Analysis of 1,996 Cases.
    Inal ZO, Inal HA, Altunkeser A, Alkan E, Arslan FZ.
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019 Nov 09; 15(8):777-784. PubMed ID: 32008545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The therapeutic effect of hysterosalpingography in couples with unexplained subfertility: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multi-centre cohort study.
    Dreyer K, van Eekelen R, Tjon-Kon-Fat RI, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans M, van der Veen F, Hompes P, Mol B, van Geloven N.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Feb 09; 38(2):233-239. PubMed ID: 30579824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in modern gynecological practice?
    Dhaliwal LK, Gupta KR, Aggarwal N.
    Int J Fertil Womens Med; 1999 Feb 09; 44(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 10499744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.