These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

199 related items for PubMed ID: 9103793

  • 1. Estimating distances on direct digital images and conventional radiographs.
    Versteeg KH, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 9103793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Efficacy of several digital radiographic imaging systems for laboratory determination of endodontic file length.
    Oliveira ML, Ambrosano GM, Almeida SM, Haiter-Neto F, Tosoni GM.
    Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):469-73. PubMed ID: 21276021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system.
    Borg E, Gröndahl HG.
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Feb; 12(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 8631285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film.
    Cederberg RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Mar; 85(3):325-8. PubMed ID: 9540092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
    de Oliveira ML, Pinto GC, Ambrosano GM, Tosoni GM.
    J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Reduction in size of digital images: does it lead to less detectability or loss of diagnostic information?
    Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, Lobach SR, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9656873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics.
    Vandenberghe B, Bud M, Sutanto A, Jacobs R.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation.
    Ellingsen MA, Harrington GW, Hollender LG.
    J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.