These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

153 related items for PubMed ID: 9105848

  • 1. Evaluation of a commercial radiometric system for primary isolation of mycobacteria over a fifteen-year period.
    Middleton AM, Chadwick MV, Gaya H.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Feb; 16(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 9105848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the automated nonradiometric Bactec MGIT 960 system with Löwenstein-Jensen, Coletsos, and Middlebrook 7H11 solid media for recovery of mycobacteria.
    Idigoras P, Beristain X, Iturzaeta A, Vicente D, Pérez-Trallero E.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 May; 19(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 10898135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Comparison of BBL mycobacteria growth indicator tube (MGIT) method, BACTEC radiometric system and Lowenstein-Jensen culture media for the detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens].
    Alp A, Hasçelik G.
    Mikrobiyol Bul; 2002 May; 36(3-4):229-35. PubMed ID: 12838655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of a nonradiometric system with Bactec 12B and culture on egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens.
    Manterola JM, Gamboa F, Padilla E, Lonca J, Matas L, Hernández A, Giménez M, Cardona PJ, Viñado B, Ausina V.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1998 Nov; 17(11):773-7. PubMed ID: 9923517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Use of BACTEC MGIT 960 for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens: multicenter study.
    Tortoli E, Cichero P, Piersimoni C, Simonetti MT, Gesu G, Nista D.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Nov; 37(11):3578-82. PubMed ID: 10523555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of a biphasic non-radiometric system with Lowenstein-Jensen and Bactec-460 system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens.
    Luquin M, Gamboa F, Barceló MG, Manterola JM, Matas L, Giménez M, Ausina V.
    Tuber Lung Dis; 1996 Oct; 77(5):449-53. PubMed ID: 8959150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of recovery rates for mycobacteria from BACTEC 12B vials, Middlebrook 7H11-selective 7H11 biplates, and Lowenstein Jensen slants in a public health mycobacteriology laboratory.
    Wilson ML, Stone BL, Hildred MV, Reves RR.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Sep; 33(9):2516-8. PubMed ID: 7494065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of a radiometric method (BACTEC) and conventional culture media for recovery of mycobacteria from smear-negative specimens.
    Morgan MA, Horstmeier CD, DeYoung DR, Roberts GD.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Aug; 18(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 6194175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of lysis-centrifugation (isolator) and radiometric (BACTEC) blood culture systems for the detection of mycobacteremia.
    Gill VJ, Park CH, Stock F, Gosey LL, Witebsky FG, Masur H.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 22(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 3908468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of the radiometric BACTEC 460 TB culture system and Löwenstein-Jensen medium for the isolation of mycobacteria in cutaneous tuberculosis and their drug susceptibility pattern.
    Aggarwal P, Singal A, Bhattacharya SN, Mishra K.
    Int J Dermatol; 2008 Jul; 47(7):681-7. PubMed ID: 18613873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system for the recovery of mycobacteria.
    Kanchana MV, Cheke D, Natyshak I, Connor B, Warner A, Martin T.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 May; 37(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 10794937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Rapid detection of mycobacteria in clinical specimens by using the automated BACTEC 9000 MB system and comparison with radiometric and solid-culture systems.
    Pfyffer GE, Cieslak C, Welscher HM, Kissling P, Rüsch-Gerdes S.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Sep; 35(9):2229-34. PubMed ID: 9276393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative evaluation of three culture methods for the isolation of mycobacteria from clinical samples.
    Sorlozano A, Soria I, Roman J, Huertas P, Soto MJ, Piedrola G, Gutierrez J.
    J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2009 Oct; 19(10):1259-64. PubMed ID: 19884789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the MB/BacT system compared with Middlebrook 7H11 and Lowenstein-Jensen media for detection and recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens.
    Gil-Setas A, Torroba L, Fernandez JL, Martinez-Artola V, Olite J.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2004 Mar; 10(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 15008943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the MB/BacT system and comparison to the BACTEC 460 system and solid media for isolation of mycobacteria from clinical specimens.
    Rohner P, Ninet B, Metral C, Emler S, Auckenthaler R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec; 35(12):3127-31. PubMed ID: 9399507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.