These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


109 related items for PubMed ID: 9108751

  • 1. The effect of serrations on carbon fibre posts-retention within the root canal, core retention, and post rigidity.
    Love RM, Purton DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):484-8. PubMed ID: 9108751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts.
    Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 11203820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of airborne-particle abrasion on mechanical properties and bond strength of carbon/epoxy and glass/bis-GMA fiber-reinforced resin posts.
    Soares CJ, Santana FR, Pereira JC, Araujo TS, Menezes MS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jun; 99(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 18514666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The influence of fatigue loading on the quality of the cement layer and retention strength of carbon fiber post-resin composite core restorations.
    Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A.
    Oper Dent; 2005 Jun; 30(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 15853108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts.
    Purton DG, Payne JA.
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Feb; 27(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 9063218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR, Ribeiro RF, Antunes RP.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
    Hedlund SO, Johansson NG, Sjögren G.
    Br Dent J; 2003 Aug 09; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of EDTA conditioning upon the retention of fibre posts luted with resin cements.
    Rasimick BJ, Shah RP, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS.
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec 09; 41(12):1101-6. PubMed ID: 19133100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Six years of in vitro/in vivo experience with Composipost.
    Dallari A, Rovatti L.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl; 1996 Dec 09; (20):S57-63. PubMed ID: 12089763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar 09; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.