These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 9114091

  • 1. Uterine neoplasms: magnetization transfer analysis of MR images.
    Kobayashi S, Takeda K, Sakuma H, Kinosada Y, Nakagawa T.
    Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 9114091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Uterine neoplasms: MR imaging.
    Worthington JL, Balfe DM, Lee JK, Gersell DJ, Heiken JP, Ling D, Glazer HS, Jacobs AJ, Kao MS, McClennan BL.
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 3010375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cervical carcinoma: dynamic MR imaging with a turbo-FLASH technique.
    Asakawa T, Joja I, Asakawa M, Mitsumori A, Nakagawa T, Kuroda M, Takeda Y, Kudo T, Hiraki Y.
    Radiat Med; 1997 Jun; 15(6):389-98. PubMed ID: 9495790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating stage IA endometrial carcinoma from normal endometrium and benign diseases of the endometrium: initial study at 3-T magnetic resonance scanner.
    Wang J, Yu T, Bai R, Sun H, Zhao X, Li Y.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jun; 34(3):332-7. PubMed ID: 20498531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic MR imaging.
    Hawighorst H, Knapstein PG, Weikel W, Knopp MV, Schaeffer U, Brix G, Essig M, Hoffmann U, Zuna I, Schönberg S, van Kaick G.
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 8888254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic effect of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging.
    Takahashi S, Murakami T, Narumi Y, Kurachi H, Tsuda K, Kim T, Enomoto T, Tomoda K, Miyake A, Murata Y, Nakamura H.
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):539-47. PubMed ID: 9457210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of breath-hold fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo pulse sequences for T2-weighted MR imaging of liver lesions.
    Rydberg JN, Lomas DJ, Coakley KJ, Hough DM, Ehman RL, Riederer SJ.
    Radiology; 1995 Feb; 194(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 7824723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Accuracy of liver fat quantification at MR imaging: comparison of out-of-phase gradient-echo and fat-saturated fast spin-echo techniques--initial experience.
    Qayyum A, Goh JS, Kakar S, Yeh BM, Merriman RB, Coakley FV.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):507-11. PubMed ID: 16244259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN, Francis IR, Herfkens RJ, Jeffrey RB, Glazer GM, Foo TK, Shimakawa A, Pelc NJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Liver masses: replacement of conventional T2-weighted spin-echo MR imaging with breath-hold MR imaging.
    Gaa J, Hatabu H, Jenkins RL, Finn JP, Edelman RR.
    Radiology; 1996 Aug; 200(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 8685342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.