These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
198 related items for PubMed ID: 9115972
1. Radiographic detection of cavitation in approximal surfaces of primary teeth using a digital storage phosphor system and conventional film, and the relationship between cavitation and radiographic lesion depth: an in vitro study. Nielsen LL, Hoernoe M, Wenzel A. Int J Paediatr Dent; 1996 Sep; 6(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 9115972 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C. Caries Res; 1994 Sep; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA. Caries Res; 2000 Sep; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film. Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of digital systems and conventional dental film for the detection of approximal enamel caries. Pontual AA, de Melo DP, de Almeida SM, Bóscolo FN, Haiter Neto F. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Oct; 39(7):431-6. PubMed ID: 20841461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems. Hintze H, Wenzel A. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the DIAGNOcam and bitewing radiographs in the diagnosis of cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars. Alamoudi NM, Khan JA, El-Ashiry EA, Felemban OM, Bagher SM, Al-Tuwirqi AA. Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1576-1582. PubMed ID: 31719280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs. Minston W, Li G, Wennberg R, Näsström K, Shi XQ. Swed Dent J; 2013 Nov; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis. Møystad A, Svanaes DB, van der Stelt PF, Gröndahl HG, Wenzel A, van Ginkel FC, Kullendorff B, Hintze H, Larheim TA. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical and radiographic assessment of approximal carious lesions. Espelid I, Tveit AB. Acta Odontol Scand; 1986 Feb; 44(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 3456691 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical cavitation and radiographic lesion depth in proximal surfaces in an Indian population. Sansare K, Raghav M, Sontakke S, Karjodkar F, Wenzel A. Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1084-8. PubMed ID: 25220524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the performance of storage phosphor plate and Insight film images for the detection of proximal caries depth. Crombie K, Parker ME, Nortje CJ, Sanderink GC. SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):452, 454-6, 458-9. PubMed ID: 20306863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Janhom A, van Ginkel FC, van Amerongen JP, van der Stelt PF. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]