These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

108 related items for PubMed ID: 9119765

  • 1. The effect of repeated daily noise exposure on sound-conditioned and unconditioned guinea pigs.
    Dagli S, Canlon B.
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):39-46. PubMed ID: 9119765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning.
    Canlon B, Fransson A.
    Hear Res; 1995 Apr; 84(1-2):112-24. PubMed ID: 7642444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Association of Caffeine and Hearing Recovery After Acoustic Overstimulation Events in a Guinea Pig Model.
    Zawawi F, Bezdjian A, Mujica-Mota M, Rappaport J, Daniel SJ.
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Apr; 142(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 26940042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during prolonged noise exposure.
    Eddins AC, Zuskov M, Salvi RJ.
    Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):119-28. PubMed ID: 9925023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2.
    Sutton LA, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK, Whitehead ML.
    Hear Res; 1994 May; 75(1-2):161-74. PubMed ID: 8071143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Conditioning the auditory system with continuous vs. interrupted noise of equal acoustic energy: is either exposure more protective?
    Skellett RA, Cullen JK, Fallon M, Bobbin RP.
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):21-32. PubMed ID: 9508025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Hydrogen-rich saline alleviates experimental noise-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs.
    Zhou Y, Zheng H, Ruan F, Chen X, Zheng G, Kang M, Zhang Q, Sun X.
    Neuroscience; 2012 May 03; 209():47-53. PubMed ID: 22387110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Lack of protection against gentamicin ototoxicity by auditory conditioning with noise].
    Strose A, Hyppolito MÂ, Colombari GC, Rossato M, Oliveira JA.
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 May 03; 80(5):390-6. PubMed ID: 25303813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B, Marklund K, Borg E.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec 03; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M, Mom T, Guitton M, Poncet JL, Bonfils P, Avan P.
    Audiology; 2001 Dec 03; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.