These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
143 related items for PubMed ID: 9132095
1. MR hysterosalpingography in a rabbit model. Lee FT, Grist TM, Nelson KG, Chosy SG, Rappe AH, Shapiro SS, Kelcz F. J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996; 6(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 9132095 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography. Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, Zhou W. J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture. Duan N, Chen X, Yin Y, Wang Z, Chen R. Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography vs. magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography for diagnosing fallopian tubal patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chen LS, Zhu ZQ, Li J, Wang ZT, Qiang Y, Hu XY, Zhang MM, Wang ZQ. Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108891. PubMed ID: 32088657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility. Unterweger M, De Geyter C, Fröhlich JM, Bongartz G, Wiesner W. Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study. Volondat M, Fontas E, Delotte J, Fatfouta I, Chevallier P, Chassang M. Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparison of assessing the patency of the Fallopian tubes during laparoscopy and during hysterosalpingography on television in infertile women with endometriosis]. Salata I, Gottwald L, Sobkiewicz S. Ginekol Pol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1014-7. PubMed ID: 14674161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography: a preliminary report. Wiesner W, Ruehm SG, Bongartz G, Kaim A, Reese E, De Geyter C. Eur Radiol; 2001 Sep; 11(8):1439-44. PubMed ID: 11519555 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women. Winter L, Glücker T, Steimann S, Fröhlich JM, Steinbrich W, De Geyter C, Pegios W. Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study. De Felice C, Rech F, Marini A, Stagnitti A, Valente F, Cipolla V, Borgogni G, Meggiorini ML. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. MR hysterosalpingography with an angiographic time-resolved 3D pulse sequence: assessment of tubal patency. Sadowski EA, Ochsner JE, Riherd JM, Korosec FR, Agrawal G, Pritts EA, Kliewer MA. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1381-5. PubMed ID: 18941073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Ultrasound hysterosalpingography with levovist in the diagnosis of tubaric patency]. Guazzaroni M, Mari A, Politi C, Guazzaroni M, Remedi S, Mallarini G, Simonetti G. Radiol Med; 2001 Nov; 102(1-2):62-6. PubMed ID: 11677440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of Fallopian tubes in infertile women]. Bacevac J, Ganović R. Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001 Nov; 129(1-2):18-21. PubMed ID: 11534279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in examination of fallopian tubes in infertile women]. Bacevac J, Ganović R. Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2001 Nov; 129(9-10):243-6. PubMed ID: 11928602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. Low RN, Francis IR. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection and staging of chondromalacia patellae: relative efficacies of conventional MR imaging, MR arthrography, and CT arthrography. Gagliardi JA, Chung EM, Chandnani VP, Kesling KL, Christensen KP, Null RN, Radvany MG, Hansen MF. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Sep; 163(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 8079858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Conventional and magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal patency-A comparative study. Jagannathan D, Hithaya F. Indian J Radiol Imaging; 2019 Sep; 29(2):163-167. PubMed ID: 31367087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can hysterolaparoscopic mediated chromopertubation obviate the need for hysterosalpingography for proximal tubal blockage?: An experience at a single tertiary care center. Agrawal N, Fayyaz S. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Apr; 48(4):241-245. PubMed ID: 29689309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media. Kahyaoglu S, Yumusak OH, Kahyaoglu I, Kucukbas GN, Esercan A, Tasci Y. J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution. Boudghène FP, Bazot M, Robert Y, Perrot N, Rocourt N, Antoine JM, Morris H, Leroy JL, Uzan S, Bigot JM. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]