These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
4023 related items for PubMed ID: 9144335
1. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Glüer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M. J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative CT assessment of the lumbar spine and radius in patients with osteoporosis. Grampp S, Jergas M, Lang P, Steiner E, Fuerst T, Glüer CC, Mathur A, Genant HK. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 8659357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry. He YQ, Fan B, Hans D, Li J, Wu CY, Njeh CF, Zhao S, Lu Y, Tsuda-Futami E, Fuerst T, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Jul; 11(4):354-60. PubMed ID: 10928226 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the skeletal status by peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the forearm: short-term precision in vivo and comparison to dual X-ray absorptiometry. Grampp S, Lang P, Jergas M, Glüer CC, Mathur A, Engelke K, Genant HK. J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Oct; 10(10):1566-76. PubMed ID: 8686514 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Oct; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does quantitative ultrasound imaging enhance precision and discrimination? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Oct; 11(5):425-33. PubMed ID: 10912845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria. Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 1999 Oct; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: site-matched correlation and discrimination of axial BMD status. Langton CM, Langton DK. Br J Radiol; 2000 Jan; 73(865):31-5. PubMed ID: 10721317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness. Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, Njeh C, Hans D, Uffmann M, Srivastav S, Genant HK. Osteoporos Int; 2001 Jan; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I. Osteoporos Int; 2000 Jan; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of osteoporosis: comparison of radiographic absorptiometry of the phalanges and dual X-ray absorptiometry of the radius and lumbar spine. Takada M, Engelke K, Hagiwara S, Grampp S, Jergas M, Glüer CC, Genant HK. Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):759-63. PubMed ID: 9051031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The discriminative ability of peripheral and axial bone measurements to identify proximal femoral, vertebral, distal forearm and proximal humeral fractures: a case control study. Clowes JA, Eastell R, Peel NF. Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):1794-802. PubMed ID: 15947861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]