These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


117 related items for PubMed ID: 914488

  • 1. Dose reduction in mammography.
    Mintzer RA, Matthies HJ, Lin PP, Neiman HL, Rogers LF.
    Invest Radiol; 1977; 12(5):465-6. PubMed ID: 914488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
    Chang CH, Sibala JL, Martin NL, Riley RC.
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Diagnostic significance of high-filtration xeromammography in relation to radiation hazard and image quality (author's transl)].
    John V, Ewen K.
    Rontgenblatter; 1978 Jun; 31(6):326-8. PubMed ID: 675061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Survey of mammography practices.
    Bassett LW, Diamond JJ, Gold RH, McLelland R.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1149-52. PubMed ID: 3318338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Single view negative mode xeromammography: an approach to reduce radiation exposure in breast cancer screening.
    Buchanan JB, Jager RM.
    Radiology; 1977 Apr; 123(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 847175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Absorbed dose in xeromammography.
    Zárand P, Péntek Z.
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Feb; 53(626):114-9. PubMed ID: 7370491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A new low dose mammography technique.
    Chang CH, Sibala JL, Martin NL, Riley RC.
    Rev Interam Radiol; 1977 Apr; 2(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 866902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Somatic radiation risk in various mammography technics].
    Ewen K, John V, vd Driesch P.
    Rontgenpraxis; 1981 Apr; 34(12):488-92. PubMed ID: 7323894
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE, Yagan R, Oravec D, Shah Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Microfocal spot magnification mammography using xeroradiographic and screen-film recording systems.
    Sickles EA.
    Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 441362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.