These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 9148263

  • 1. Hard contact lenses alter accommodative gain but do not prevent refractive adaptation in chicks.
    Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 74(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 9148263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Imposed retinal image size changes--do they provide a cue to the sign of lens-induced defocus in chick?
    Schmid KL, Strang NC, Wildsoet CF.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 May; 76(5):320-5. PubMed ID: 10375249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Natural and imposed astigmatism and their relation to emmetropization in the chick.
    Schmid K, Wildsoet CF.
    Exp Eye Res; 1997 May; 64(5):837-47. PubMed ID: 9245915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Constant light rearing disrupts compensation to imposed- but not induced-hyperopia and facilitates compensation to imposed myopia in chicks.
    Padmanabhan V, Shih J, Wildsoet CF.
    Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(14):1855-68. PubMed ID: 17512028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Imposed anisometropia, accommodation, and regulation of refractive state.
    Troilo D, Totonelly K, Harb E.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jan; 86(1):E31-9. PubMed ID: 19104464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig.
    Howlett MH, McFadden SA.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 18992765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye: a summary and update.
    Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Nov; 35(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 26497292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Choroidal and scleral mechanisms of compensation for spectacle lenses in chicks.
    Wildsoet C, Wallman J.
    Vision Res; 1995 May; 35(9):1175-94. PubMed ID: 7610579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Emmetropization in chicks uses optical vergence and relative distance cues to decode defocus.
    Wildsoet CF, Schmid KL.
    Vision Res; 2001 Nov; 41(24):3197-204. PubMed ID: 11711143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects on the compensatory responses to positive and negative lenses of intermittent lens wear and ciliary nerve section in chicks.
    Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF.
    Vision Res; 1996 Apr; 36(7):1023-36. PubMed ID: 8736261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dynamics of active emmetropisation in young chicks--influence of sign and magnitude of imposed defocus.
    Hammond DS, Wallman J, Wildsoet CF.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 May; 33(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 23662956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Neural pathways subserving negative lens-induced emmetropization in chicks--insights from selective lesions of the optic nerve and ciliary nerve.
    Wildsoet C.
    Curr Eye Res; 2003 Dec; 27(6):371-85. PubMed ID: 14704921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks.
    Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 May; 68(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 1852398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye.
    Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 1293533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Developmental compensation of imposed astigmatism is not initiated by astigmatic accommodation in chickens.
    Thomas S, Schaeffel F.
    Vision Res; 2000 Oct; 40(26):3553-8. PubMed ID: 11116159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Potency of myopic defocus in spectacle lens compensation.
    Zhu X, Winawer JA, Wallman J.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 44(7):2818-27. PubMed ID: 12824218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of continuous light on experimental refractive errors in chicks.
    Guo SS, Sivak JG, Callender MG, Herbert KL.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Nov; 16(6):486-90. PubMed ID: 8944195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Ocular compensation for alternating myopic and hyperopic defocus.
    Winawer J, Zhu X, Choi J, Wallman J.
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(13):1667-77. PubMed ID: 15792842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
    Kimura S, Hasebe S, Ohtsuki H.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Local changes in eye growth induced by imposed local refractive error despite active accommodation.
    Diether S, Schaeffel F.
    Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):659-68. PubMed ID: 9156210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.