These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 9156715

  • 1. [Oocyte donation: ethical aspects related to the donor].
    Englert Y, Rodesch C, Laruelle C, Govoerts I.
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1997 Mar; 25(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 9156715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Oocyte donation: particular technical and ethical aspects.
    Englert Y, Govaerts I.
    Hum Reprod; 1998 May; 13 Suppl 2():90-7. PubMed ID: 9665329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Attitudes of different groups of women in Sweden to oocyte donation and oocyte research.
    Westlander G, Janson PO, Tägnfors U, Bergh C.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1998 Mar; 77(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 9539279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: a systematic review.
    Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Bora S, Ismail AM, Al-Memar M, Hamed AH, Abdalla H, Thum MY.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):450-65. PubMed ID: 27016289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Oocyte donors. Psychological aspects].
    Raoul-Duval A, Letur-Könirsch H, Bertrand-Servais M, Frydman R.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993 Jun; 22(7):766-70. PubMed ID: 7508467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Recipients of oocytes donated anonymously. Psychological aspects].
    Bertrand-Servais M, Letur-Könirsch H, Raoul-Duval A, Frydman R.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1992 Jun; 21(7):743-9. PubMed ID: 1469228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Semen donor recruitment in an oocyte donation programme.
    Ferraretti AP, Pennings G, Gianaroli L, Magli MC.
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Oct; 21(10):2482-5. PubMed ID: 16740525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Counselling couples and donors for oocyte donation: the decision to use either known or anonymous oocytes.
    Baetens P, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I.
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Feb; 15(2):476-84. PubMed ID: 10655327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Prognostic factors in oocyte donation: an analysis through egg-sharing recipient pairs showing a discordant outcome.
    Bodri D, Colodron M, Vidal R, Galindo A, Durban M, Coll O.
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1548-53. PubMed ID: 17412330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Secrecy and anonymity in gametes donation].
    Le Lannou D.
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2010 May; 38(5):324-31. PubMed ID: 20430672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Ethics of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a systematic review.
    Kool EM, Bos AME, van der Graaf R, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2018 Sep 01; 24(5):615-635. PubMed ID: 29762669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cryobiology in human assisted reproductive technology. Would Hippocrates approve?
    Bredkjaer HE, Grudzinskas JG.
    Early Pregnancy (Cherry Hill); 2001 Jul 01; 5(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 11753534
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons.
    Yee S, Hitkari JA, Greenblatt EM.
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jul 01; 22(7):2040-50. PubMed ID: 17507386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Ovum donation. A review of and a suggestion to unified guidelines for treatment at public fertility clinics in Denmark].
    Andersen AN, Larsen JF, Hornnes PJ, Starup J, Andersen CY, Westergaard LG, Rasmussen PE, Ingerslev HJ, Maigaard S.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 Aug 16; 155(33):2515-9. PubMed ID: 8212352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Attitude and considerations of sperm donors in relation to insemination].
    Pedersen B, Nielsen AF, Lauritsen JG.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1995 Aug 07; 157(32):4462-5. PubMed ID: 7483027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sperm and oocyte donors' experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring.
    Jadva V, Freeman T, Kramer W, Golombok S.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Mar 07; 26(3):638-45. PubMed ID: 21177310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey.
    Brett S, Sacranie RR, Thomas GE, Rajkhowa R.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2008 Jun 07; 11(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 18569065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 2: Oocyte donors.
    Daniels K.
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2007 Dec 07; 10(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 18049958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Emotional and relational aspects of egg-sharing: egg-share donors' and recipients' feelings about each other, each others' treatment outcome and any resulting children.
    Gürtin ZB, Ahuja KK, Golombok S.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Jun 07; 27(6):1690-701. PubMed ID: 22434851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Psychiatric issues in non-anonymous oocyte donation. Motivations and expectations of women donors and recipients.
    Bartlett JA.
    Psychosomatics; 1991 Jun 07; 32(4):433-7. PubMed ID: 1961858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.