These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

116 related items for PubMed ID: 9165676

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem.
    Cohen MC, Paley MN, Griffiths PD, Whitby EH.
    Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2008; 11(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18237232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MRI in fetal necropsy.
    Brookes JS, Hagmann C.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1221-8. PubMed ID: 17083087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Low-field dedicated magnetic resonance imaging: a potential tool for assisting perinatal autopsy.
    Langer B, Choquet P, Ravier S, Gasser B, Schlaeder G, Constantinesco A.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 12(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 9819860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice.
    Alderliesten ME, Peringa J, van der Hulst VP, Blaauwgeers HL, van Lith JM.
    BJOG; 2003 Apr; 110(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 12699799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging: luxury or necessity?
    Cannie M, Jani J, Dymarkowski S, Deprest J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 27(5):471-6. PubMed ID: 16619388
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Minimally invasive fetal postmortem examination using magnetic resonance imaging and computerised tomography: current evidence and practical issues.
    Thayyil S, Chitty LS, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ.
    Prenat Diagn; 2010 Aug; 30(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 20661883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Postmortem MR imaging in the fetal and neonatal period.
    Lequin MH, Huisman TA.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2012 Feb; 20(1):129-43. PubMed ID: 22118597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Less invasive perinatal autopsies and the future of postmortem science.
    Sebire NJ, Taylor AM.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):609-11. PubMed ID: 22641584
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of a fetal intracardiac mass.
    Ong S, Usher-Somers M, Philip S, Miller P, Foster K, Marton T, Martin W, Kilby M.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):600-1. PubMed ID: 17444555
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Magnetic resonance imaging in fetal medicine].
    Skrablin S, Padovan-Stern R, Banović V, Rados M, Kuvacić I, Lovrić H.
    Lijec Vjesn; 2006 May; 128(3-4):79-83. PubMed ID: 16808096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.