These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


117 related items for PubMed ID: 9170033

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
    Low RN, Francis IR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Low density barium and bentonite mixture versus high density barium: a comparative study to optimize negative gastrointestinal contrast agents for MRI.
    Paley MR, Nicolas AI, Mergo PJ, Torres GM, Burton SS, Ros PR.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1997 Oct; 15(9):1033-6. PubMed ID: 9364949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A potentially artifact-free oral contrast agent for gastrointestinal MRI.
    Liebig T, Stoupis C, Ros PR, Ballinger JR, Briggs RW.
    Magn Reson Med; 1993 Nov; 30(5):646-9. PubMed ID: 8259066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of oral contrast agents for abdominal magnetic resonance imaging.
    Kraus BB, Rappaport DC, Ros PR, Torres GM.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1994 Nov; 12(6):847-58. PubMed ID: 7968284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW, Frager DH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Improved technique for pancreatic MRI: value of oblique fat suppression imaging with oral barium administration.
    Helmberger T, Mergo PJ, Stoupis C, Torres GM, Burton SS, Ros PR.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998 May; 22(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 9606379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cost-effectiveness of double-contrast barium enema in screening for colorectal cancer.
    Glick S, Wagner JL, Johnson CD.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 9490943
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Formulation of radiographically detectable gastrointestinal contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging: effects of a barium sulfate additive on MR contrast agent effectiveness.
    Rubin DL, Muller HH, Young SW.
    Magn Reson Med; 1992 Jan; 23(1):154-65. PubMed ID: 1734177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. High density barium sulphate as an MRI oral contrast.
    Marti-Bonmati L, Vilar J, Paniagua JC, Talens A.
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1991 Jan; 9(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 2034060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Optimization of dosage and exam technique in the use of oral contrast media in magnetic resonance].
    Broglia L, Tortora A, Maccioni F, Arpesani R, Marcelli G, Ascarelli A, Rossi P.
    Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):365-70. PubMed ID: 10432968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Techniques for high-resolution echo-planar MR imaging of the pancreas.
    Reimer P, Saini S, Hahn PF, Mueller PR, Brady TJ, Cohen MS.
    Radiology; 1992 Jan; 182(1):175-9. PubMed ID: 1727278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.