These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1132 related items for PubMed ID: 9170825

  • 1. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH, Chang FM.
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Rahall A, Jones MM, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.
    Fletcher HM, Mitchell S, Simeon D, Frederick J, Brown D.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):641-4. PubMed ID: 8369246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D, Brown D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P, Porter B, Ferri N, Summers J, Templeton A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening.
    Charoenkul S, Sripramote M.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Sep; 83(9):1026-34. PubMed ID: 11075969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Alfirevic Z.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, Yeomans ER.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK, Papageorghiou AT, Otigbah CM, Howard RJ, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Jones MM, Rahall A, Goodwin TM, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1804-10. PubMed ID: 7778636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rosa C, Del Valle GO, Gaudier FL, Delke I, Kaunitz AM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
    Chitrakar NS.
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents.
    Ramsey PS, Harris DY, Ogburn PL, Heise RH, Magtibay PM, Ramin KD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Feb; 188(2):560-5. PubMed ID: 12592272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A, Senat MV, Ehlinger V, Gallini A, Morin M, Olivier P, Roth E, Orusco E, Javoise S, Fort J, Lavergne C, Arnaud C, Rozenberg P, Vayssiere C, Groupe de Recherche en Obstétrique rt Gynécologie.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) in the preinduction and induction of labor.
    Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B, Laskowska M, Oleszczuk J.
    Med Sci Monit; 2001 Nov; 7(5):1023-8. PubMed ID: 11535953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P, Pokpirom J.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 57.