These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1132 related items for PubMed ID: 9170825

  • 21. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N, Gupta A, Kriplani A, Bhatla N, Parul.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Has R, Batukan C, Ermis H, Cevher E, Araman A, Kiliç G, Ibrahimoğlu L.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002 Jun; 53(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 11803223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S, Mitra SN, Banerjee PK, Biswas PK, Bhattacharyya S.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
    De Bonrostro Torralba C, Tejero Cabrejas EL, Envid Lázaro BM, Franco Royo MJ, Roca Arquillué M, Campillos Maza JM.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jul; 175(1):158-64. PubMed ID: 8694043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F, Rodrigues R, Meirinho M.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr 01; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA, Paul RH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul 01; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
    Sharma Y, Kumar S, Mittal S, Misra R, Dadhwal V.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun 01; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X, Yang A, Ma Q, Li X, Qin L, He T.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep 01; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Khoury AN, Zhou QP, Gorenberg DM, Nies BM, Manley GE, Mecklenburg FE.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun 01; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
    Blanc-Petitjean P, Carbonne B, Deneux-Tharaux C, Salomé M, Goffinet F, Le Ray C, MEDIP study group.
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep 01; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Using of Misoprostol for preinduction and induction of labor in term pregnancy].
    Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B, Laskowska M, Oleszczuk J.
    Ginekol Pol; 1999 Dec 01; 70(12):881-9. PubMed ID: 10715910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb 01; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002 Feb 01; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Rust OA, Greybush M, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Balducci J.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct 01; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan 01; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L, Reisinger-Kindle K, Roy A, Levine L, Connolly K, Visintainer P, Schoen CN.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov 01; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW.
    BJOG; 2008 Sep 01; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug 01; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 57.