These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

226 related items for PubMed ID: 9172631

  • 1. [Speech audiometry with logatomes].
    Welge-Lüssen A, Hauser R, Erdmann J, Schwob C, Probst R.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 9172631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Aug; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Comparative speech audiometry studies with compact disk].
    Plath P, Doerr L.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Oct; 71(10):530-3. PubMed ID: 1418231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds.
    Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Suitability of speech audiometry study procedures for current demands in clinical and general practice].
    von Wedel H.
    HNO; 1986 Feb; 34(2):71-4. PubMed ID: 3957726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A, McDermott HJ, Dowell RC.
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment.
    Verstraeten N, Zarowski AJ, Somers T, Riff D, Offeciers EF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18957902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI, Raffin MJ.
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Mills DM, Feeney MP, Gates GA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):778-92. PubMed ID: 17982366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effects of increasing consonant/vowel intensity ratio on speech loudness.
    Montgomery AA, Prosek RA, Walden BE, Cord MT.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Dec; 24(4):221-8. PubMed ID: 3430381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Rehabilitation of high-frequency hearing loss with the RetroX auditory implant.
    Garin P, Genard F, Galle C, Fameree MH, Jamart J, Gersdorff M.
    B-ENT; 2005 Feb; 1(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15999671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The performance/intensity function: an underused resource.
    Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):479-91. PubMed ID: 18469711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH, Ho HC, Wu HP.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Reaction times at auditory threshold: a comparison of normal hearing probands and patients with hearing damage].
    Hustert B, Kumpf W, Stoll W.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Mar; 75(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 8652028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C, Sukowksi H, Lenarz T, Lesinski-Schiedat A.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Experiences with the distorted Freiburg Speech Test--diagnosis and rehabilitation of hearing disorders].
    Dieroff HG, Mangoldt W.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Jul; 68(7):372-8. PubMed ID: 2765049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech recognition and sound quality for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Picou EM, Marcrum SC, Ricketts TA.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 25731581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.