These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

87 related items for PubMed ID: 9173420

  • 1. [Value of lung filter, asymmetric film-screen technique and digital storage screen radiography in diagnosis of coin lesion].
    Müller RD, Hirche H, Wähling S, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, Turowski B, John V, Blendl C, Langer R.
    Pneumologie; 1997 Mar; 51(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 9173420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. ROC-analysis of detection performance by analogue and digital plain film systems in chest radiography.
    Müller RD, Wähling S, Hirche H, Voss M, Blendl C, Gocke C, Gocke P, Buddenbrock B, John V, Wiebringhaus R, Turowski B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Nov; 37(6):847-54. PubMed ID: 8995453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Selenium radiography versus storage phosphor and conventional radiography in the detection of simulated chest lesions.
    Schaefer-Prokop CM, Prokop M, Schmidt A, Neitzel U, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8816519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C, Aberle DR, Sayre JW, Hart EM, Greaves SM, Brown K, Young DA, Deseran MD, Johnson T, Johnson SL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of simulated chest lesions: comparison of a conventional screen-film combination, an asymmetric screen-film system, and storage phosphor radiography.
    Leppert AG, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Galanski M.
    Radiology; 1995 Apr; 195(1):259-63. PubMed ID: 7892482
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Diagnosis of metastases in thoracic images. Progress by further development of the conventional film-foil technique?].
    Lehmann KJ, Himmighöfer U.
    Radiologe; 1994 Oct; 34(10):592-8. PubMed ID: 7816917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Digital image intensifier radiography and film-screen combinations in pulmonary nodules].
    Dölken W, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Jenett M.
    Rofo; 1989 Aug; 151(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 2548236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
    Busch HP.
    Bildgebung; 1991 Aug; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Drescher P, Loose R, Georgi M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ, Kroft LJ, Mertens BJ, Geleijns J.
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.