These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 9180527

  • 1. Supreme Court protects communications in psychotherapy.
    Cesario FJ.
    J Law Med Ethics; 1996; 24(4):388-9. PubMed ID: 9180527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Jaffee v. Redmond: psychotherapist-patient privilege in the federal courts.
    Appelbaum PS.
    Psychiatr Serv; 1996 Oct; 47(10):1033-4, 1052. PubMed ID: 8890329
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Jaffee v. Redmond: making the courts a tool of injustice?
    Chan KW.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997 Oct; 25(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 9323663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The ethical and legal implications of Jaffee v Redmond and the HIPAA medical privacy rule for psychotherapy and general psychiatry.
    Mosher PW, Swire PP.
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 2002 Sep; 25(3):575-84, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 12232971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Rationales for the confidentiality of psychotherapist-patient communications: testimonial privilege and the Constitution.
    Courville CP.
    Houst Law Rev; 1998 Sep; 35(1):187-226. PubMed ID: 14628847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Correction to "Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege".
    Marsh JE.
    Ethics Behav; 2004 Sep; 14(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 15835047
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Justices uphold psychotherapy privacy rights.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1996 Jun 14; ():A1, A25. PubMed ID: 11648020
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. "I'm your therapist, you can tell me anything": the Supreme Court confirm psychotherapist-patient privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond.
    Klein JS.
    De Paul Law Rev; 1998 Jun 14; 47(3):701-41. PubMed ID: 14628783
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA.
    Ohio State Law J; 1998 Jun 14; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Psychotherapy and disclosure: recent court decisions.
    Furlong A, Lefebvre MS.
    Can J Psychiatry; 1998 Sep 14; 43(7):731-6. PubMed ID: 9773223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The federal psychotherapist-patient privilege, the purported "dangerous patient" exception, and its impact on African American access to mental health services.
    Johnson AN.
    Howard Law J; 2005 Sep 14; 48(3):1025-51. PubMed ID: 17063601
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Supreme Court's decision to recognize a psychotherapist privilege in Jaffee v. Redmond, 116 S. Ct. 1923 (1996): the meaning of "experience and the role of "reason" under Federal Rule of Evidence 501.
    Amann DM, Imwinkelried EJ.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1997 Sep 14; 65(4):1019-49. PubMed ID: 16086528
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Marching to the beat of a different drummer: is military law and mental health out-of-step after Jaffee v. Redmond?
    Zanotti BJ, Becker RA.
    Air Force Law Rev; 1997 Sep 14; 41():1-82. PubMed ID: 16211752
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Empirical support for the United States Supreme Court's protection of the psychotherapist-patient privilege.
    Marsh JE.
    Ethics Behav; 2003 Sep 14; 13(4):385-400. PubMed ID: 15000103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Confidentiality of mental health records in federal courts: the path blazed by Sabree v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joinders of America, Local No. 33.
    Ruschioni SL.
    New Engl Law Rev; 2004 Sep 14; 38(4):923-37. PubMed ID: 16482691
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ohio's patient-physician privilege: whether planned parenthood is a protected party.
    O'Neill M.
    J Law Health; 2004 Sep 14; 17(2):297-325. PubMed ID: 15853129
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Privacy, consent, and the electronic mental health record: The Person vs. the System.
    Clemens NA.
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2012 Jan 14; 18(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 22261983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Online without a net: physician-patient communication by electronic mail.
    Spielberg AR.
    Am J Law Med; 1999 Jan 14; 25(2-3):267-95. PubMed ID: 10476331
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.