These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 9185352

  • 61. The optimum circular field size for dental radiography with intraoral films.
    van Straaten FJ, van Aken J.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 Sep; 54(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 6957831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E, Carlsson GA, Eckerdal O, Sandborg M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Automatic processing: effects of temperature and time changes on the sensitometric properties of light-sensitive films.
    Thunthy KH, Hashimoto K, Weinberg R.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jul; 72(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 1891230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. [Characteristics of high-speed dental X-ray film--regarding AGFA-GEVAERT DENTUS M-2 (SOFTPAC)].
    Watanabe Y, Yamashita Y, Hoshino N, Hoshino Y, Yamada H, Niwa K, Kanai Y.
    Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1984 Jul; 13(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 6596967
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC.
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70. In vivo determination of radiographic projection errors produced by a novel filmholder and an x-ray beam manipulator.
    Zappa U, Simona C, Graf H, van Aken J.
    J Periodontol; 1991 Nov; 62(11):674-83. PubMed ID: 1753320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73. [Improvement of radiation hygiene with Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic film].
    Rotgans J.
    Quintessenz; 1983 Apr; 34(4):703-10. PubMed ID: 6576411
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR, Brand JW.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79. [Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic films].
    Andersen HE.
    Tandlaegebladet; 1983 Sep; 87(15):513-6. PubMed ID: 6581558
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.