These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
86 related items for PubMed ID: 9187004
1. Word recognition in continuous noise, interrupted noise, and in quiet by normal-hearing listeners at two sensation levels. Stuart A, Phillips DP. Scand Audiol; 1997; 26(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 9187004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners. Stuart A, Phillips DP. Ear Hear; 1996 Dec; 17(6):478-89. PubMed ID: 8979036 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. Stuart A. Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):78-88. PubMed ID: 15692306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN. Ear Hear; 2012 Feb; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. Stuart A, Phillips DP, Green WB. Am J Otol; 1995 Sep; 16(5):658-63. PubMed ID: 8588673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: effects of hearing loss and presentation level. Summers V, Molis MR. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Apr; 47(2):245-56. PubMed ID: 15157127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of companding on speech recognition in quiet and noise for listeners with ANSD. Narne VK, Barman A, Deepthi M. Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24237041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Normal and hearing-impaired word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and noise. Beattie RC, Barr T, Roup C. Br J Audiol; 1997 Jun; 31(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 9276098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of contralateral noise on speech detection and speech reception thresholds. Frank T, Karlovich RS. Audiology; 1975 Jun; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 1147844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of spatial hearing to speech recognition in young people with normal hearing. Song PL, Li HJ, Wang NY. Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Dec; 124(24):4269-74. PubMed ID: 22340398 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory temporal resolution in normal-hearing preschool children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise. Stuart A, Givens GD, Walker LJ, Elangovan S. J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1946-9. PubMed ID: 16642807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners. Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA. Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of temporal envelope cues in speech recognition by normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Turner CW, Souza PE, Forget LN. J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Apr; 97(4):2568-76. PubMed ID: 7714274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH, Humes LE, Amos NE, Strauser LE. Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]