These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

178 related items for PubMed ID: 9194213

  • 1. Self-rating Barthel index compatible with the original Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure motor score.
    Hachisuka K, Okazaki T, Ogata H.
    J UOEH; 1997 Jun 01; 19(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 9194213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel Index.
    Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkuma H, Tanaka S, Dozono K.
    Clin Rehabil; 1997 Feb 01; 11(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 9065357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke.
    Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL.
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2002 Aug 01; 73(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 12122181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Examination of reliability and validity of the Self-Assessment Burden Scale-Motor for community-dwelling older adults in Japan: a validation study.
    Warabino H, Kaneda T, Nagata Y, Yokoi K, Nakaoka K, Higashi Y, Yuri Y, Hashimoto H, Takabatake S.
    PeerJ; 2024 Aug 01; 12():e17730. PubMed ID: 39035163
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validity and reliability of a performance evaluation tool based on the modified Barthel Index for stroke patients.
    Ohura T, Hase K, Nakajima Y, Nakayama T.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug 25; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28841846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Can a Barthel score be derived from the FIM?
    Nyein K, McMichael L, Turner-Stokes L.
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Feb 25; 13(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 10327098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.
    Houlden H, Edwards M, McNeil J, Greenwood R.
    Clin Rehabil; 2006 Feb 25; 20(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 16541936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale: Psychometric properties during medication phases in idiopathic Parkinson disease.
    Taghizadeh G, Martinez-Martin P, Meimandi M, Habibi SAH, Jamali S, Dehmiyani A, Rostami S, Mahmuodi A, Mehdizadeh M, Fereshtehnejad SM.
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2020 Nov 25; 63(6):500-504. PubMed ID: 31816448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index.
    Gosman-Hedström G, Svensson E.
    Disabil Rehabil; 2000 Nov 10; 22(16):702-15. PubMed ID: 11117590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the FIM + FAM in patients with cerebrovascular accident.
    Miki E, Yamane S, Yamaoka M, Fujii H, Ueno H, Kawahara T, Tanaka K, Tamashiro H, Inoue E, Okamoto T, Kuriyama M.
    Scand J Occup Ther; 2016 Sep 10; 23(5):398-404. PubMed ID: 26463478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients: concurrent validity.
    Simondson JA, Goldie P, Greenwood KM.
    Clin Rehabil; 2003 Aug 10; 17(5):558-64. PubMed ID: 12952164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure.
    van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ.
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1999 Apr 10; 66(4):480-4. PubMed ID: 10201420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the short-form Barthel Index (5 items) and its associations with chronic stroke-specific impairments.
    Park CS.
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2018 Jun 10; 30(6):835-839. PubMed ID: 29950775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Agreement of functional independence measure item scores in patients transferred from one rehabilitation setting to another.
    Kohler F, Dickson H, Redmond H, Estell J, Connolly C.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec 10; 45(4):479-85. PubMed ID: 20032905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Equating activities of daily living outcome measures: the Functional Independence Measure and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index.
    Hong I, Woo HS, Shim S, Li CY, Yoonjeong L, Velozo CA.
    Disabil Rehabil; 2018 Jan 10; 40(2):217-224. PubMed ID: 27930889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Capabilities of Upper Extremity instrument: reliability and validity of a measure of functional limitation in tetraplegia.
    Marino RJ, Shea JA, Stineman MG.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1998 Dec 10; 79(12):1512-21. PubMed ID: 9862292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Validity of the PULSES profile compared with the Functional Independence Measure for measuring disability in a stroke rehabilitation setting.
    Marshall SC, Heisel B, Grinnell D.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1999 Jul 10; 80(7):760-5. PubMed ID: 10414759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Disability measures in stroke: relationship among the Barthel Index, the Functional Independence Measure, and the Modified Rankin Scale.
    Kwon S, Hartzema AG, Duncan PW, Min-Lai S.
    Stroke; 2004 Apr 10; 35(4):918-23. PubMed ID: 14976324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comorbidity measures for stroke outcome research: a preliminary study.
    Liu M, Domen K, Chino N.
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1997 Feb 10; 78(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 9041898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the Barthel Index-based Supplementary Scales in patients with stroke.
    Lee YC, Yu WH, Hsueh IP, Chen SS, Hsieh CL.
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Oct 10; 53(5):710-718. PubMed ID: 28178771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.