These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 9196674

  • 1. Non-stereoscopic cues in the Random-Dot E stereotest: results for adult observers.
    Fricke T, Siderov J.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Mar; 17(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 9196674
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Assessing the Frisby Stereo Test under monocular viewing conditions.
    Cooper J, Feldman J.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jul; 50(7):807-9. PubMed ID: 500992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A new stereotest: the double two rod test.
    Fan WC, Brown B, Yap MK.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 May; 16(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 8977882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia.
    Hariharan-Vilupuru S, Bedell HE.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli.
    Batvinionak AA, Gracheva MA, Bolshakov AS, Rozhkova GI.
    Perception; 2015 Jan; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The accuracy of metric judgements: perception of surface normal.
    Porrill J, Duke PA, Taroyan NA, Frisby JP, Buckley D.
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun 11; 50(12):1140-57. PubMed ID: 20298712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Neural correlates of monocular and binocular depth cues based on natural images: a LORETA analysis.
    Fischmeister FP, Bauer H.
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct 11; 46(20):3373-80. PubMed ID: 16828836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Peripheral fading with monocular and binocular viewing.
    González EG, Weinstock M, Steinbach MJ.
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan 11; 47(1):136-44. PubMed ID: 17081583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of apparent depth in pictorial images on accommodation.
    Busby A, Ciuffreda KJ.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul 11; 25(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 15953117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Flash lag in depth.
    Harris LR, Duke PA, Kopinska A.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep 11; 46(17):2735-42. PubMed ID: 16469350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.