These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Changes in reciprocal inhibition across the ankle joint with changes in external load and pedaling rate during bicycling. Pyndt HS, Laursen M, Nielsen JB. J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3168-77. PubMed ID: 12878714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Muscle enhancement using closed-loop electrical stimulation: volitional versus induced torque. Langzam E, Nemirovsky Y, Isakov E, Mizrahi J. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Jun; 17(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 16690326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of effort and EMG levels on short-latency stretch reflex modulation after varying background muscle contractions. Ogiso K, McBride JM, Finni T, Komi PV. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 15811603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Isometric and concentric performance of electrically stimulated ankle plantar flexor muscles in intact rat. Willems ME, Stauber WT. Exp Physiol; 1999 Mar; 84(2):379-89. PubMed ID: 10226178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Tennis players show a lower coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles during isokinetic exercises. Bazzucchi I, Riccio ME, Felici F. J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2008 Oct; 18(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 17449279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Fatigability and variable-frequency train stimulation of human skeletal muscles. Bickel CS, Slade JM, Warren GL, Dudley GA. Phys Ther; 2003 Apr; 83(4):366-73. PubMed ID: 12665407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The effects of a 28-Hz vibration on arm muscle activity during isometric exercise. Mischi M, Cardinale M. Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Mar; 41(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19204585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Feedback control methods for task regulation by electrical stimulation of muscles. Lan N, Crago PE, Chizeck HJ. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Dec; 38(12):1213-23. PubMed ID: 1774083 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Nonlinear joint angle control for artificially stimulated muscle. Veltink PH, Chizeck HJ, Crago PE, el-Bialy A. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Apr; 39(4):368-80. PubMed ID: 1592402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [The manifestation of the hysteresis effects of muscle contraction in the cortically evoked coactivation of muscle antagonists]. Tal'nov AN, Kostiukov AI. Neirofiziologiia; 1991 Apr; 23(4):481-4. PubMed ID: 1922566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. FES control of isometric forces in the rat hindlimb using many muscles. Jarc AM, Berniker M, Tresch MC. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 May; 60(5):1422-30. PubMed ID: 23303688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Force-velocity relations of nine load-moving skeletal muscles. Baratta RV, Solomonow M, Best R, Zembo M, D'Ambrosia R. Med Biol Eng Comput; 1995 Jul; 33(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 7475384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Co-contraction of antagonist muscles during knee extension against gravity: insights for functional electrical stimulation control design. Lynch CL, Sayenko D, Popovic MR. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012 Jul 01; 2012():1843-6. PubMed ID: 23366271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]