These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 9225425

  • 1. Comparison of two suture materials for intradermal skin closure in dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J, Maarschalkerweerd RJ, Koeman JP, Kooistra HS, van Sluijs FJ.
    Vet Q; 1997 Mar; 19(1):20-2. PubMed ID: 9225425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats.
    Papazoglou LG, Tsioli V, Papaioannou N, Georgiadis M, Savvas I, Prassinos N, Kouti V, Bikiaris D, Hadzigiannakis C, Zavros N.
    Can Vet J; 2010 Jul; 51(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 20885834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The role of suture material in hypertrophic scar formation: Monocryl vs. Vicryl-rapide.
    Niessen FB, Spauwen PH, Kon M.
    Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Sep; 39(3):254-60. PubMed ID: 9326705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of continuous intradermal with simple interrupted suture pattern: an experimental study in dogs.
    Gouletsou PG, Prassinos NN, Papazoglou LG, Kostoulas P, Galatos AD.
    Top Companion Anim Med; 2020 Nov; 41():100454. PubMed ID: 32823154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs.
    Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N.
    Am J Vet Res; 2005 Nov; 66(11):1975-84. PubMed ID: 16334959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparative study of the healing process when using Vicryl®, Vicryl Rapid®, Vicryl Plus®, and Monocryl® sutures in the rat dermal tissue.
    Gartti-Jardim EC, de Souza AP, Carvalho AC, Pereira CC, Okamoto R, Magro Filho O.
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 17(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 23269361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the healing of prescrotal urethrotomy incisions in the dog: sutured versus nonsutured.
    Weber WJ, Boothe HW, Brassard JA, Hobson HP.
    Am J Vet Res; 1985 Jun; 46(6):1309-15. PubMed ID: 3927800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The intradermal cutaneous suture with separate stitches using a resorbable monofilament (Polyglecaprone 25)].
    Molea G, Tirone L, Schonauer F.
    Minerva Chir; 1997 Oct; 52(10):1261-5. PubMed ID: 9471583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical Testing and Histologic Examination of Intradermal Skin Closure in Dogs Using Barbed Suture Device and Non-Barbed Monofilament Suture.
    Law AY, Butler JR, Patnaik SS, Cooley JA, Elder SH.
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 27805732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Laparoscopic suturing: effect of instrument handling on suture strength.
    Bariol SV, Stewart GD, Tolley DA.
    J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1127-33. PubMed ID: 16283852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative study of cotton, polyglactin and polyglecaprone sutures in intestinal anastomoses in dogs.
    Bernis-Filho WO, Wouters F, Wouters AA, Bernis VM, Lopes LR, Andreollo NA.
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2013 Nov; 26(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 23702865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of polydioxanone and polyglactin 910 in intradermal repair.
    Guyuron B, Vaughan C.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Oct; 98(5):817-20. PubMed ID: 8823020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of three closure methods and two absorbable suture materials for closure of jejunal enterotomy incisions in healthy dogs.
    Kirpensteijn J, Maarschalkerweerd RJ, van der Gaag I, Kooistra HS, van Sluijs FJ.
    Vet Q; 2001 Apr; 23(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11361101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Immunohistochemical comparison of indermil with traditional suture materials in dental surgery.
    Muglali M, Ylmaz N, Inal S, Guvenc T.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1875-9. PubMed ID: 21959453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.