These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
196 related items for PubMed ID: 9225669
1. Management of stable coronary artery disease. Gutstein DE, Fuster V. Am Fam Physician; 1997 Jul; 56(1):99-106, 111-3. PubMed ID: 9225669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of patient charges associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. Walls JT, Boley TM, Rives L, Koenig S, Curtis JJ. Am Surg; 1994 Jan; 60(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 8273975 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Survival in patients with peripheral vascular disease after percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. O'Rourke DJ, Quinton HB, Piper W, Hernandez F, Morton J, Hettleman B, Hearne M, Nugent W, O'Connor GT, Malenka DJ, Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Aug 18; 78(2):466-70; discussion 470. PubMed ID: 15276497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year outcome after coronary angioplasty versus bypass surgery in multivessel coronary artery disease: results from the French Monocentric Study. Carrié D, Elbaz M, Puel J, Fourcade J, Karouny E, Fournial G, Galinier M. Circulation; 1997 Nov 04; 96(9 Suppl):II-1-6. PubMed ID: 9386066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock (SHOCK) trial. White HD, Assmann SF, Sanborn TA, Jacobs AK, Webb JG, Sleeper LA, Wong CK, Stewart JT, Aylward PE, Wong SC, Hochman JS. Circulation; 2005 Sep 27; 112(13):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 16186436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience. Reynolds MR, Neil N, Ho KK, Berezin R, Cosgrove RS, Lager RA, Sirois C, Johnson RG, Cohen DJ. Am Heart J; 2003 Feb 27; 145(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 12595853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of body mass index on the outcome of patients with multivessel disease randomized to either coronary artery bypass grafting or stenting in the ARTS trial: The obesity paradox II? Gruberg L, Mercado N, Milo S, Boersma E, Disco C, van Es GA, Lemos PA, Ben Tzvi M, Wijns W, Unger F, Beyar R, Serruys PW, Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Investigators. Am J Cardiol; 2005 Feb 15; 95(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 15695125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Morrison DA, Sacks J. Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Oct 15; 51(5):585-97. PubMed ID: 14551526 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]