These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Dance DR. Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of radiographic techniques (kVp and mAs) on image quality and patient doses in digital subtraction angiography. Gkanatsios NA, Huda W, Peters KR. Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1643-50. PubMed ID: 12201409 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic]. Fiedler E, Aichinger U, Böhner C, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Bautz W. Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-]. Honda C, Ohara H, Ishisaka A, Shimada F, Endo T. Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Jul; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of fixed and variable kVp technique protocols for film-screen mammography. McParland BJ, Boyd MM. Br J Radiol; 2000 Jun; 73(870):613-26. PubMed ID: 10911785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study. Schindera ST, Winklehner A, Alkadhi H, Goetti R, Fischer M, Gnannt R, Szucs-Farkas Z. Clin Radiol; 2013 Feb; 68(2):e79-86. PubMed ID: 23219454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnification mammography: a low-dose technique. Arnold BA, Eisenberg H, Bjarngard BE. Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 441382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]