These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

178 related items for PubMed ID: 9228846

  • 1. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment.
    Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 9228846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions.
    Obijou C, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9294358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG, Dischinger T, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Post-treatment occlusal changes in Class II division 2 subjects treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Bock N, Ruf S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):606-13. PubMed ID: 19054814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL, Lima T, Palomares N, Carvalho FA, Quintão C, Miguel JAM, Lin YL, Su TL, O'Brien K.
    Trials; 2017 Nov 25; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Nov 25; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug 25; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug 25; 28(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 16644850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dentoskeletal effects during Herbst-Multibracket appliance treatment: a comparison of lingual and labial approaches.
    Bock NC, Ruf S, Wiechmann D, Jilek T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Oct 25; 38(5):470-7. PubMed ID: 26378084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The Herbst appliance combined with a completely customized lingual appliance: A retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System.
    Mujagic M, Pandis N, Fleming PS, Katsaros C.
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec 25; 18(4):732-738. PubMed ID: 32839142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A, Uysal T.
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr 25; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 1997 Apr 25; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
    Amuk NG, Baysal A, Coskun R, Kurt G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan 25; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The integrated Herbst appliance--treatment effects in a group of adolescent males with Class II malocclusions compared with growth changes in an untreated control group.
    Hägglund P, Segerdal S, Forsberg CM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr 25; 30(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 18216374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
    Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, Omblus J, Hansen K.
    Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb 25; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Class II malocclusion treatment with the Herbst appliance in patients after the growth peak.
    Alvares JC, Cançado RH, Valarelli FP, de Freitas KM, Angheben CZ.
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013 Feb 25; 18(5):38-45. PubMed ID: 24352386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Aug 25; 126(2):140-52; quiz 254-5. PubMed ID: 15316468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Post-treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. A radiographic, clinical and biometric investigation.
    Hansen K.
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1992 Aug 25; 88():1-49. PubMed ID: 1492308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.