These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

320 related items for PubMed ID: 9228905

  • 1. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Votipka JR.
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jul; 45(1):20. PubMed ID: 9228905
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.
    Fletcher H, Mitchell S, Frederick J, Simeon D, Brown D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Feb; 83(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 8290188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
    Jouatte F, Subtil D, Marquis P, Plennevaux JL, Puech F.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E, Guerra-Velásquez M, Torres-Montilla M, Reyna-Villasmil N, Mejia-Montilla J, Labarca-Vincero N.
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone.
    Ayaz A, Shaukat S, Farooq MU, Mehmood K, Ahmad I, Ali Bahoo ML.
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 49(2):151-5. PubMed ID: 20708519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB, Thigpen BD, Bofill JA, Magann E, Moore LE, Martin JN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Diro M, Adra A, Gilles JM, Nassar A, Rodriguez A, Salamat SM, Beydoun SN, O'Sullivan MJ, Yasin SY, Burkett G.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999 Jan; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Perry KG, Larmon JE, May WL, Robinette LG, Martin RW.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1333-40. PubMed ID: 9662319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG, Tedesco RP, Pires HM, Calderon IM, Faúndes A.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006 Jun; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study].
    Zou LY, Fan L, Duan T, Wang ZL, Ma RM.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 21029599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Oral misoprostol and intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized comparison.
    Bartha JL, Comino-Delgado R, Garcia-Benasach F, Martinez-Del-Fresno P, Moreno-Corral LJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 96(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 10960643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D, Figueroa R, Kalish RB, Catalano CJ, Maulik D.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.