These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

509 related items for PubMed ID: 9241300

  • 1. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix.
    Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 9241300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, van den Akker ES, Aarts MJ, Scheve EJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lin MG, Reid KJ, Treaster MR, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Lu GC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC, Krammer J, O'Brien WF.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
    Panel P, Bascou V, de Meeus JB, Magnin G.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997 Nov; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Induction of labor by intracervical prostaglandin gel and oxytocin infusion in primigravid women with unfavorable cervix.
    Ashrafunnessa, Khatun SS, Chowdhury SA, Begum SR, Rashid M, Khatun MS.
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1997 Dec; 23(3):66-71. PubMed ID: 9621474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Role of prostaglandin-induced cervical changes in labor induction.
    Jagani N, Schulman H, Fleischer A, Mitchell J, Blattner P.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 6582419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
    Facchinetti F, Venturini P, Verocchi G, Volpe A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr 01; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of spontaneous labor with induced vaginal tablets prostaglandin E2 in grand multiparae.
    Sobande AA, Al-Bar HM, Archibong EI.
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Aug 01; 22(8):698-701. PubMed ID: 11573116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of low-dose oxytocin and dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm pregnancies: a randomized controlled prospective study.
    Akay NÖ, Hızlı D, Yılmaz SS, Yalvaç S, Kandemir O.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2012 Aug 01; 73(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 22433939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios.
    Venturini P, Contu G, Mazza V, Facchinetti F.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Feb 01; 17(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 16076620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb 01; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Preeclampsia: is induction of labor more successful?
    Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Field N, Conway D, Langer O.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Apr 01; 89(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 9083320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul 01; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Elective induction of labor: failure to follow guidelines and risk of cesarean delivery.
    Le Ray C, Carayol M, Bréart G, Goffinet F, PREMODA Study Group.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007 Jul 01; 86(6):657-65. PubMed ID: 17520395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr 01; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.
    Culver J, Strauss RA, Brody S, Dorman K, Timlin S, McMahon MJ.
    Am J Perinatol; 2004 Apr 01; 21(3):139-46. PubMed ID: 15085496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Cervical maturation and induction of labor with PgE2 gel. Authors' experience].
    Carta G, Vigilante M, Di Cesare S, Mascaretti G, Caserta D, Moscarini M.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997 Oct 01; 49(10):427-32. PubMed ID: 9463175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative study of induction of labor in nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes at term compared to those with intact membranes: duration of labor and mode of delivery.
    Park KH, Hong JS, Ko JK, Cho YK, Lee CM, Choi H, Kim BR.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2006 Oct 01; 32(5):482-8. PubMed ID: 16984515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Diro M, Adra A, Gilles JM, Nassar A, Rodriguez A, Salamat SM, Beydoun SN, O'Sullivan MJ, Yasin SY, Burkett G.
    J Matern Fetal Med; 1999 Oct 01; 8(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 10338065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.