These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

241 related items for PubMed ID: 9246984

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A.
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar 12; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures.
    Papakonstantinou MK, Hart MJ, Farrugia R, Gabbe BJ, Kamali Moaveni A, van Bavel D, Page RS, Richardson MD.
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr 12; 86(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 26887373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Proximal Humerus Fractures: Reliability of Neer Versus AO Classification on Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography.
    Stoddart M, Pearce O, Smith J, McCann P, Sheridan B, Al-Hourani K.
    Cureus; 2020 Jun 09; 12(6):e8520. PubMed ID: 32656034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.
    Bruinsma WE, Guitton TG, Warner JJ, Ring D, Science of Variation Group.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep 04; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients.
    Sumrein BO, Mattila VM, Lepola V, Laitinen MK, Launonen AP, NITEP Group.
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct 04; 27(10):1756-1761. PubMed ID: 29866397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproducibility of the modified Neer classification defining displacement with respect to the humeral head fragment for proximal humeral fractures.
    Matsumura N, Furuhata R, Seto T, Takada Y, Shirasawa H, Oki S, Kawano Y, Shiono S.
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Sep 23; 15(1):438. PubMed ID: 32967709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Dec 23; 75(12):1745-50. PubMed ID: 8258543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs.
    Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Sep 23; 78(9):1371-5. PubMed ID: 8816653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.