These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

194 related items for PubMed ID: 9252930

  • 1. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
    Risberg B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM, Blythe JG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Brush vs. spatula for cervical smears. Histologic correlation with concurrent biopsies.
    Chakrabarti S, Guijon FB, Paraskevas M.
    Acta Cytol; 1994 Oct; 38(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 8191818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
    Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S, Isenstein L.
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F, Boon ME, Beck S, Knottnerus JA, Essed GG.
    Acta Cytol; 1991 Aug; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
    Neinstein LS, Church J, Akiyoshi T.
    J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Acceptable quality cervical cytology taking: comparison of Cervex-brush and Cervex-mex methods].
    Ojeda Ortiz J, Muñoz Molina R, Pardo López M, Guevara Cruz M, Hernández Quijano T, Valencia Elizondo C, Hernández Valencia M.
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2008 Jul; 76(7):381-5. PubMed ID: 18798438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ.
    Acta Cytol; 1989 Jul; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Safety, efficacy and cost of three cervical cytology sampling devices in a prenatal clinic.
    Smith-Levitin M, Hernandez E, Anderson L, Heller P.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):749-53. PubMed ID: 8913977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush.
    Ferris DG, Berrey MM, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Voxnaes J, Beatie RT.
    J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.