These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


84 related items for PubMed ID: 9258109

  • 1. Re: Insertion of double pigtail ureteral stent for the prevention of urological complications in renal transplantation: a prospective randomized study.
    Haab F, Pedron P, Gattegno B, Thibault P.
    J Urol; 1997 Sep; 158(3 Pt 1):888. PubMed ID: 9258109
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Impact of stents on urological complications and health care expenditure in renal transplant recipients: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
    Tavakoli A, Surange RS, Pearson RC, Parrott NR, Augustine T, Riad HN.
    J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2260-4; discussion 2264. PubMed ID: 17509336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Insertion of a double pigtail ureteral stent for the prevention of urological complications in renal transplantation: a prospective randomized study.
    Benoit G, Blanchet P, Eschwege P, Alexandre L, Bensadoun H, Charpentier B.
    J Urol; 1996 Sep; 156(3):881-4. PubMed ID: 8709353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Advantages of short-time ureteric stenting for prevention of urological complications in kidney transplantation: an 18-year experience.
    Sansalone CV, Maione G, Aseni P, Mangoni I, Soldano S, Minetti E, Radaelli L, Civati G.
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Sep; 37(6):2511-5. PubMed ID: 16182728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Double J stent with antireflux device in the prevention of short-term urological complications after cadaveric kidney transplantation: single-center prospective randomized study.
    Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Selvaggio O, Palazzo S, Bettocchi C, Peschechera R, Di Paolo S, Stallone G, Schena A, Grandaliano G, D'Orazio E, Selvaggi FP.
    Transplant Proc; 2005 Sep; 37(6):2525-6. PubMed ID: 16182733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Surgical treatment of urological complications after kidney transplantation.
    Król R, Ziaja J, Chudek J, Heitzman M, Pawlicki J, Wiecek A, Cierpka L.
    Transplant Proc; 2006 Sep; 38(1):127-30. PubMed ID: 16504682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Is routine ureteral stenting cost-effective in renal transplantation?
    DuBay DA, Lynch R, Cohn J, Ads Y, Punch JD, Pelletier SJ, Campbell DA, Englesbe MJ.
    J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2509-13; discussion 2513. PubMed ID: 17937936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Infective complications associated with ureteral stents in renal transplant recipients.
    Ranganathan M, Akbar M, Ilham MA, Chavez R, Kumar N, Asderakis A.
    Transplant Proc; 2009 Dec; 41(1):162-4. PubMed ID: 19249503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Urological complications in 980 consecutive patients with renal transplantation.
    Davari HR, Yarmohammadi H, Malekhosseini SA, Salahi H, Bahador A, Salehipour M.
    Int J Urol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1271-5. PubMed ID: 17010003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.