These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

154 related items for PubMed ID: 9260422

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Fracture resistance of incisor teeth restored using fibre-reinforced posts and threaded metal posts: effect of post length, location, pretreatment and cementation of the final restoration.
    Schmitter M, Lippenberger S, Rues S, Gilde H, Rammelsberg P.
    Int Endod J; 2010 May; 43(5):436-42. PubMed ID: 20518938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The effect of a resin-based sealer on crown retention for three types of cement.
    Johnson GH, Hazelton LR, Bales DJ, Lepe X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):428-35. PubMed ID: 15153849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effect of eugenol-containing and resin endodontic sealers on retention of prefabricated metal posts cemented with zinc phosphate and resin cements.
    Farid F, Mahgoli H, Hosseini A, Chiniforush N.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Oct; 57(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 24095644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Enhancing the retention of prefabricated metal posts and resin cores.
    McArdle BF.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Oct; 131(10):1470-1. PubMed ID: 11042987
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts.
    Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Oct; 17(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 15237877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Post and core retention with different cements.
    Leary JM, Holmes DC, Johnson WT.
    Gen Dent; 1995 Oct; 43(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 8941732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Rigidity and retention of ceramic root canal posts.
    Purton DG, Love RM, Chandler NP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 11203820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effect of types of luting agent on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts.
    Aleisa KI, Almufleh BS, Morgano SM, Lynch CD.
    J Dent; 2013 Apr; 41(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 23438419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Radiographic appearance of titanium alloy prefabricated posts cemented with different luting materials.
    Goss JM, Wright WJ, Bowles WF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 1527746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.