These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

193 related items for PubMed ID: 9265021

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z, Filipović D, Milosević D.
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Arnold DJ, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1999 Feb; 125(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 10037289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Effect of contralateral noise exposure on otoacoustic distortion product emissions in man].
    Richter B, Hauser R, Löhle E.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Mar; 74(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7755853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R, Salvi R, Chen L.
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996 Mar; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of contralateral stimulation by two-tone complexes, narrow-band and broad-band noise signals on the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission levels in humans.
    Lisowska G, Smurzynski J, Morawski K, Namyslowski G, Probst R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Sep; 122(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 12403123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F, Boettcher FA, Sun XM.
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans studied with amplitude-modulated tones.
    Maison S, Micheyl C, Collet L.
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):1759-68. PubMed ID: 9114234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones.
    Kawase T, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Dec; 70(6):2519-32. PubMed ID: 8120596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Effect of Contralateral Pure Tones on the Compound Action Potential in Humans: Efferent Tuning Curves.
    Najem F, Ferraro J, Chertoff M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):103-16. PubMed ID: 26905530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Age-related declines in distortion product otoacoustic emissions utilizing pure tone contralateral stimulation in CBA/CaJ mice.
    Varghese GI, Zhu X, Frisina RD.
    Hear Res; 2005 Nov; 209(1-2):60-7. PubMed ID: 16061336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [A study on the contralateral suppressive effects of distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Wang H, Zhong N.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1997 Nov; 11(11):489-92. PubMed ID: 10323015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Contralateral auditory stimulation alters acoustic distortion products in humans.
    Moulin A, Collet L, Duclaux R.
    Hear Res; 1993 Feb; 65(1-2):193-210. PubMed ID: 8458751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.