These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
193 related items for PubMed ID: 9277639
21. Two-dimensional fetal biometry versus three-dimensional fractional thigh volume for ultrasonographic prediction of birthweight. Sharma KA, Das D, Dadhwal V, Deka D, Singhal S, Vanamail P. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Apr; 145(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 30702147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population. Chen P, Yu J, Li X, Wang Y, Chang C. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of Fractional Limb Volume Measurements with Neonatal Morphometric Indices. Cinar HB, Sezik M. Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2021 Sep; 86(1-2):94-99. PubMed ID: 33472205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Estimation of fetal weight by measurement of fetal thigh soft-tissue thickness in the late third trimester. Scioscia M, Scioscia F, Vimercati A, Caradonna F, Nardelli C, Pinto LR, Selvaggi LE. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):314-20. PubMed ID: 18307214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated Fractional Limb Volume Measurements Improve the Precision of Birth Weight Predictions in Late Third-Trimester Fetuses. Mack LM, Kim SY, Lee S, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Lee W. J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 28439966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection. Pagani G, Palai N, Zatti S, Fratelli N, Prefumo F, Frusca T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of normal fetal thigh volume. Chang CH, Yu CH, Chang FM, Ko HC, Chen HY. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Mar; 29(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 12706186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Finding the best formula to predict the fetal weight: comparison of 18 formulas. Esinler D, Bircan O, Esin S, Sahin EG, Kandemir O, Yalvac S. Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015 Mar; 80(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 26183256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimation of fetal weight in fetuses with abdominal wall defects: comparison of 2 recent sonographic formulas to the Hadlock formula. Nicholas S, Tuuli MG, Dicke J, Macones GA, Stamilio D, Odibo AO. J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jul; 29(7):1069-74. PubMed ID: 20587430 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Approach for estimating fetal body weight using two-dimensional ultrasound. Isobe T. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Apr; 15(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 15280129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight with the use of computerized artificial neural network model. Chuang L, Hwang JY, Chang CH, Yu CH, Chang FM. Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Aug; 28(8):991-6. PubMed ID: 12217434 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Efficacy of fetal thigh volumetry in predicting birth weight using the virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) technique. Park J, Kim TH, Lee HH. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 42(6):757-62. PubMed ID: 26753480 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. How good is fetal weight estimation using volumetric methods? Siemer J, Peter W, Zollver H, Hart N, Müller A, Meurer B, Goecke T, Schild RL. Ultraschall Med; 2008 Aug; 29(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 18484061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Clinical study of Osaka formula and improved multiparameter ultrasonic measurement for fetal weight estimation]. Qiu YW, Zhong M, Chen CH, Hu ML, Chen LN, Sun XY, Su GD, Song TR, Yu YH. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Apr; 27(4):458-60. PubMed ID: 17545030 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]