These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
111 related items for PubMed ID: 9278665
1. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional triple assessment in locally recurrent breast cancer. Mumtaz H, Davidson T, Hall-Craggs MA, Payley M, Walmsley K, Cowley G, Taylor I. Br J Surg; 1997 Aug; 84(8):1147-51. PubMed ID: 9278665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Drew PJ, Chatterjee S, Turnbull LW, Read J, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, Monson JR, Kerin MJ. Ann Surg Oncol; 1999 Sep; 6(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 10493630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of local recurrences in breast cancer. Krämer S, Schulz-Wendtland R, Hagedorn K, Bautz W, Lang N. Anticancer Res; 1998 Sep; 18(3C):2159-61. PubMed ID: 9703776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast MRI in the evaluation of locally recurrent or new breast cancer in the postoperative patient: correlation of morphology and enhancement features with the BI-RADS category. Seely JM, Nguyen ET, Jaffey J. Acta Radiol; 2007 Oct; 48(8):838-45. PubMed ID: 17851971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. Mumtaz H, Hall-Craggs MA, Davidson T, Walmsley K, Thurell W, Kissin MW, Taylor I. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):417-24. PubMed ID: 9242745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Local recurrence of breast cancer after breast preserving surgery. Experiences with a triple test as a routine control]. Johanson A, Sager EM. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1992 Feb 28; 112(6):760-2. PubMed ID: 1561597 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer recurrence. Belli P, Costantini M, Romani M, Marano P, Pastore G. Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Jun 28; 73(3):223-35. PubMed ID: 12160328 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Indications for MR mammography. A Belgian study. Van Goethem M, Biltjes IG, De Schepper AM. JBR-BTR; 2000 Jun 28; 83(3):126-9. PubMed ID: 11025925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local recurrent breast carcinoma. Lewis-Jones HG, Whitehouse GH, Leinster SJ. Clin Radiol; 1991 Mar 28; 43(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 1849473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography for evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed unilateral breast cancer or high-risk lesions. Pediconi F, Catalano C, Roselli A, Padula S, Altomari F, Moriconi E, Pronio AM, Kirchin MA, Passariello R. Radiology; 2007 Jun 28; 243(3):670-80. PubMed ID: 17446524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery. Boné B, Aspelin P, Isberg B, Perbeck L, Veress B. Acta Radiol; 1995 Mar 28; 36(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 7710787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]