These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

295 related items for PubMed ID: 9283675

  • 1. A comparison of transparent polyurethane and dry gauze dressings for peripheral i.v. catheter sites: rates of phlebitis, infiltration, and dislodgment by patients.
    Tripepi-Bova KA, Woods KD, Loach MC.
    Am J Crit Care; 1997 Sep; 6(5):377-81. PubMed ID: 9283675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized study comparing IV 3000 (transparent polyurethane dressing) to a dry gauze dressing for peripheral intravenous catheter sites.
    Madeo M, Martin C, Nobbs A.
    J Intraven Nurs; 1997 Sep; 20(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 9369626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of dressing regimens for prevention of infection with peripheral intravenous catheters. Gauze, a transparent polyurethane dressing, and an iodophor-transparent dressing.
    Maki DG, Ringer M.
    JAMA; 1987 Nov 06; 258(17):2396-403. PubMed ID: 3118061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Bacterial colonization and phlebitis-associated risk with transparent polyurethane film for peripheral intravenous site dressings.
    Hoffmann KK, Western SA, Kaiser DL, Wenzel RP, Groschel DH.
    Am J Infect Control; 1988 Jun 06; 16(3):101-6. PubMed ID: 3408013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Peripheral intravenous catheter dressing and securement practice is associated with site complications and suboptimal dressing integrity: A secondary analysis of 40,637 catheters.
    Corley A, Ullman AJ, Mihala G, Ray-Barruel G, Alexandrou E, Rickard CM.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2019 Dec 06; 100():103409. PubMed ID: 31629208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A transparent polyurethane membrane used as an I.V. dressing.
    Nicola M, DeChairo D.
    NITA; 1984 Dec 06; 7(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 6561401
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparative safety and costs of transparent versus gauze wound dressings in intravenous catheterization.
    Chico-Padrón RM, Carrión-García L, Delle-Vedove-Rosales L, González-Vargas CS, Marrero-Perera M, Medina-Chico S, Rodríguez-Díaz MP, Alonso-Díaz M, Jiménez-Sosa A.
    J Nurs Care Qual; 2011 Dec 06; 26(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 21407090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Novel technologies can provide effective dressing and securement for peripheral arterial catheters: A pilot randomised controlled trial in the operating theatre and the intensive care unit.
    Reynolds H, Taraporewalla K, Tower M, Mihala G, Tuffaha HW, Fraser JF, Rickard CM.
    Aust Crit Care; 2015 Aug 06; 28(3):140-8. PubMed ID: 25583412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative study of two securement techniques for short peripheral intravenous catheters.
    Wood D.
    J Intraven Nurs; 1997 Aug 06; 20(6):280-5. PubMed ID: 9423389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.