These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

180 related items for PubMed ID: 9287085

  • 1. Summary and evaluation of guidelines for occupational exposure to power frequency electric and magnetic fields.
    Bailey WH, Su SH, Bracken TD, Kavet R.
    Health Phys; 1997 Sep; 73(3):433-53. PubMed ID: 9287085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of biological effects, dosimetric models, and exposure assessment related to ELF electric- and magnetic-field guidelines.
    Kavet R, Stuchly MA, Bailey WH, Bracken TD.
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Dec; 16(12):1118-38. PubMed ID: 11783873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Probabilistic approach to ranking sources of uncertainty in ELF magnetic field exposure limits.
    Bailey WH, Su SH, Dan Bracken T.
    Health Phys; 1999 Sep; 77(3):282-90. PubMed ID: 10456499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dealing with uncertainty in formulating occupational and public exposure limits.
    Bailey WH.
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):402-8. PubMed ID: 12199554
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Exposure guidelines for low-frequency electric and magnetic fields: report from the Brussels workshop.
    Sheppard AR, Kavet R, Renew DC.
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep; 83(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 12199546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses.
    Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, Hubmann G, Jandrisovits R, Kern M, Kundi M, Moshammer H, Lercher P, Müller K, Oberfeld G, Ohnsorge P, Pelzmann P, Scheingraber C, Thill R.
    Rev Environ Health; 2016 Sep 01; 31(3):363-97. PubMed ID: 27454111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Intensity-time dependence dosing criterion in the EMF exposure guidelines in Russia.
    Rubtsova N, Paltsev Y, Perov S, Bogacheva E.
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2018 Sep 01; 37(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 29493302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Assessing compliance with power-frequency magnetic-field guidelines.
    Bracken TD.
    Health Phys; 2002 Sep 01; 83(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 12199555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of the safety of users of active implantable medical devices (AIMD) in the working environment in terms of exposure to electromagnetic fields - Practical approach to the requirements of European Directive 2013/35/EU.
    Zradziński P, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Leszko W.
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2018 Dec 20; 31(6):795-808. PubMed ID: 30520435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Current densities in a pregnant woman model induced by simultaneous ELF electric and magnetic field exposure.
    Cech R, Leitgeb N, Pediaditis M.
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan 07; 53(1):177-86. PubMed ID: 18182695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluating occupational 60-hertz electric-field exposures for guideline compliance.
    Bracken TD, Senior R, Tuominen M.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Oct 07; 1(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 15631058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Recent advances in research relevant to electric and magnetic field exposure guidelines.
    Kavet R, Bailey WH, Bracken TD, Patterson RM.
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2008 Oct 07; 29(7):499-526. PubMed ID: 18618584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields. The situation in Greece.
    Gourzoulidis GA, Tsaprouni P, Skamnakis Ν, Tzoumanika C, Kalampaliki E, Karastergios E, Gialofas A, Achtipis A, Kappas C, Karabetsos E.
    Phys Med; 2018 May 07; 49():83-89. PubMed ID: 29866347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of nonuniform 60-hertz magnetic-field exposures for compliance with guidelines.
    Bracken TD, Dawson T.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Oct 07; 1(10):629-38. PubMed ID: 15631054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biological interactions and potential health effects of extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields from power lines and other common sources.
    Tenforde TS.
    Annu Rev Public Health; 1992 Oct 07; 13():173-96. PubMed ID: 1599584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of cardiac-induced endogenous fields and power frequency induced exogenous fields in an anatomical model of the human body.
    Hart RA, Gandhi OP.
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct 07; 43(10):3083-99. PubMed ID: 9814536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields and recently updated safety guidelines for strong static magnetic fields.
    Yamaguchi-Sekino S, Sekino M, Ueno S.
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2011 Oct 07; 10(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 21441722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A multi-scale computational approach based on TMS experiments for the assessment of electro-stimulation thresholds of the brain at intermediate frequencies.
    Soldati M, Mikkonen M, Laakso I, Murakami T, Ugawa Y, Hirata A.
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov 09; 63(22):225006. PubMed ID: 30412473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.