These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


106 related items for PubMed ID: 9294575

  • 1. Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma.
    Rieber A, Merkle E, Zeitler H, Görich J, Kreienberg R, Brambs HJ, Tomczak R.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(5):780-4. PubMed ID: 9294575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
    Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Bowsley SJ, Carleton PJ, Fox JN, Turnbull LW, Horsman A.
    Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MRI of breast cancer: influence of chemotherapy on sensitivity.
    Rieber A, Zeitler H, Rosenthal H, Görich J, Kreienberg R, Brambs HJ, Tomczak R.
    Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):452-8. PubMed ID: 9227225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. MRI of histologically confirmed mammary carcinoma: clinical relevance of diagnostic procedures for detection of multifocal or contralateral secondary carcinoma.
    Rieber A, Merkle E, Böhm W, Brambs HJ, Tomczak R.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997 May; 21(5):773-9. PubMed ID: 9294574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations.
    Cohen EK, Leonhardt CM, Shumak RS, Soutar IC, Bukhanov K, Fishell EK, Plewes DB.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Jun; 47(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8640412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profiles.
    Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, Dervan PA, Ennis JT.
    Radiology; 1990 Feb; 174(2):491-4. PubMed ID: 2296657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts.
    Boné B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, Isberg B, Perbeck L, Veress B.
    Acta Radiol; 1996 Mar; 37(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 8600964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
    Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, Winston JS, Edge SB, Arredondo MA, Mazurchuk RV, Blumenson LE.
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy.
    Belli P, Pastore G, Romani M, Terribile D, Canadè A, Costantini M.
    Rays; 2002 Nov; 27(4):241-57. PubMed ID: 12696288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. MR imaging of the breast after surgery for breast cancer.
    Whitehouse GH, Moore NR.
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 Nov; 2(4):591-603. PubMed ID: 7489311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dynamic 3D-MR mammography: is there a benefit of sophisticated evaluation of enhancement curves for clinical routine?
    Müller-Schimpfle M, Ohmenhäuser K, Sand J, Stoll P, Claussen CD.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1997 Nov; 7(1):236-40. PubMed ID: 9039622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in 238 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Boné B, Péntek Z, Perbeck L, Veress B.
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Jul; 38(4 Pt 1):489-96. PubMed ID: 9240665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Dynamic 3D MR mammography using a rapid gradient-echo sequence].
    Müller-Schimpfle M, Rieber A, Kurz S, Stern W, Claussen CD.
    Rofo; 1995 Jan; 162(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 7841394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Potential of MR mammography to predict tumor grading of invasive breast cancer.
    Dietzel M, Baltzer PA, Vag T, Zoubi R, Gröschel T, Burmeister H, Gajda M, Runnebaum IB, Kaiser WA.
    Rofo; 2011 Sep; 183(9):826-33. PubMed ID: 21442559
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.