These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

152 related items for PubMed ID: 9307821

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids.
    Moore BC, Glasberg BR.
    Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 3390637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA, Moore BC, Alcántara JI, Glasberg BR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC, Peters RW, Stone MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Moore BC, Johnson JS, Clark TM, Pluvinage V.
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):349-70. PubMed ID: 1487095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid.
    Moore BC, Stainsby TH, Alcántara JI, Kühnel V.
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Oct; 43(7):399-409. PubMed ID: 15515639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect on the speech reception threshold in noise of the recovery time of the compressor in the high-frequency channel of a two-channel aid.
    Moore BC, Glasberg BR, Stone MA.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jun; 38():82-91. PubMed ID: 8153569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by two-channel compression hearing aids.
    Moore BC, Laurence RF, Wright D.
    Br J Audiol; 1985 Aug; 19(3):175-87. PubMed ID: 4063555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
    Kowalewski B, Zaar J, Fereczkowski M, MacDonald EN, Strelcyk O, May T, Dau T.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Aug; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Dual Variable Speed Compressor over a Single Fixed Speed Compressor.
    Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P, Seper E, Hau O.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Aug; 30(7):590-606. PubMed ID: 30420004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.