These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 9311186

  • 21. Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis.
    Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Uno M, Tada K, Iwata H, Komeda H, Maeda S, Latila V, Saito I, Kawada Y.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jul; 34(7):1708-10. PubMed ID: 8784574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of a new amplified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in male urine, female endocervical swab, and patient obtained vaginal swab specimens.
    Tanaka M, Nakayama H, Sagiyama K, Haraoka M, Yoshida H, Hagiwara T, Akazawa K, Naito S.
    J Clin Pathol; 2000 May; 53(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 10889816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Study on Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection in first-voided urine sediments].
    Hayashi K, Kumamoto Y, Tsukamoto T, Hirose T, Satou T, Gohro T, Ikegaki S, Tatsuki J, Minami K, Yoshio H.
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1991 Jan; 65(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 2066594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Diagnosis of male Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction.
    Wiesenfeld HC, Uhrin M, Dixon BW, Sweet RL.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1994 Jan; 21(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 7817260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Non-invasive detection of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in asymptomatic males and females by enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme).
    Adjei O, Lal V.
    J Trop Med Hyg; 1994 Feb; 97(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 8107174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and IDEIA Chlamydia in detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from first-voided urine of male urethritis patients].
    Komeda H, Deguchi T, Tada K, Yamamoto H, Kanematsu E, Iwata H, Okano M, Ito Y, Saito A, Ban Y.
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 1992 Oct; 66(10):1473-8. PubMed ID: 1293226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay.
    Krepel J, Laur I, Sproston A, Luinstra K, Jang D, Mahony J, Chernesky M.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Nov; 33(11):2847-9. PubMed ID: 8576331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Confirmatory polymerase chain reaction testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in first-void urine from asymptomatic and symptomatic men.
    Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Jang D, Chernesky MA.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Sep; 30(9):2241-5. PubMed ID: 1400986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urethral and urine samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic male patients by the polymerase chain reaction.
    Stary A, Choueiri B, Hörting-Müller I, Halisch P, Teodorowicz L.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Jun; 15(6):465-71. PubMed ID: 8839640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia test, Chlamydiazyme, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women with a low prevalence of infection.
    Skulnick M, Small GW, Simor AE, Low DE, Khosid H, Fraser S, Chua R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Sep; 29(9):2086-8. PubMed ID: 1774342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Distribution of EIA reactive values and serum antibody titers of Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis and cervicitis at the first visit].
    Kojima H, Takai K, Fukazawa T, Noguchi Y.
    Rinsho Byori; 1996 Feb; 44(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 8851199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A comparison of an enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genito-urinary specimens.
    Jensen BL, Hoff G, Weismann K.
    Sex Transm Dis; 1988 Feb; 15(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 3041629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Use of pooled urine samples and automated DNA isolation to achieve improved sensitivity and cost-effectiveness of large-scale testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women.
    Rours GI, Verkooyen RP, Willemse HF, van der Zwaan EA, van Belkum A, de Groot R, Verbrugh HA, Ossewaarde JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4684-90. PubMed ID: 16145127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of PCR/nucleic acid hybridization and EIA for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in different populations in a regional centre.
    Farrell DJ, Haran MV, Park BW.
    Pathology; 1996 Jan; 28(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 8714278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Rapid, on-site diagnosis of chlamydial urethritis in men by detection of antigens in urethral swabs and urine.
    Sellors J, Mahony J, Jang D, Pickard L, Castriciano S, Landis S, Stewart I, Seidelman W, Cunningham I, Chernesky M.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Feb; 29(2):407-9. PubMed ID: 2007651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.