These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 9330610

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    Rosenberg RD, Hunt WC, Williamson MR, Gilliland FD, Wiest PW, Kelsey CA, Key CR, Linver MN.
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mammographic screening for non-palpable breast cancer in Japan.
    Ohnuki K.
    Breast Cancer; 2005 Nov; 12(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 16286905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Current status and goals of mammographic screening for breast cancer in Japan.
    Morimoto T, Okazaki M, Endo T.
    Breast Cancer; 2004 Nov; 11(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 14718797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performance of a subsidised mammographic screening programme in Malaysia, a middle-income Asian country.
    Lee M, Mariapun S, Rajaram N, Teo SH, Yip CH.
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Jan 28; 17(1):127. PubMed ID: 28129762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A Comparison of Mass Screening for Breast Cancer Using Mammography and Physical Examination Alone in Japan.
    Morimoto T, Sasa M, Yamaguchi T, Harada K, Sagara Y.
    Breast Cancer; 1995 Apr 30; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 11091528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ, Burhenne LW, Goldberg F, Hislop TG, Worth AJ, Rebbeck PM, Kan L.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May 30; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V.
    JAMA; 1993 Nov 24; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Early results of breast cancer screening research].
    Nowicki A, Stogowska I.
    Ginekol Pol; 2007 Jun 24; 78(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17899703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Opportunistic mammography screening provides effective detection rates in a limited resource healthcare system.
    Teh YC, Tan GH, Taib NA, Rahmat K, Westerhout CJ, Fadzli F, See MH, Jamaris S, Yip CH.
    BMC Cancer; 2015 May 15; 15():405. PubMed ID: 25972043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Current Status of Screening for Breast Cancer and Tasks for Introduction of Mammographic Screening in Japan.
    Morimoto T, Sasa M.
    Breast Cancer; 1998 Jul 25; 5(3):227-234. PubMed ID: 11091653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A simulation model investigating the impact of tumor volume doubling time and mammographic tumor detectability on screening outcomes in women aged 40-49 years.
    Bailey SL, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK.
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug 18; 102(16):1263-71. PubMed ID: 20664027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.