These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
161 related items for PubMed ID: 9345818
1. The role of acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation testing. Roithmann R, Shpirer I, Cole P, Chapnik J, Szalai JP, Zamel N. Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Oct; 76(10):747-50, 752. PubMed ID: 9345818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison between anterior rhinomanometry and impulse-oscillometric rhinometry found within nasal allergen provocation]. Galetke W, Randerath W, David M, Rühle KH. Pneumologie; 2001 Sep; 55(9):420-4. PubMed ID: 11536065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Acoustic rhinometry: determination of early and late-phase reactions in allergic rhinitis]. Bujía J, Rasp G. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1997 Sep; 48(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 9131923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of nasal hyper-responsiveness by allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis: the role of afferent and efferent nerves. Sheahan P, Walsh RM, Walsh MA, Costello RW. Clin Exp Allergy; 2005 Jan; 35(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 15649265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Nasal conditioning in perennial allergic rhinitis after nasal allergen challenge. Rozsasi A, Leiacker R, Keck T. Clin Exp Allergy; 2004 Jul; 34(7):1099-104. PubMed ID: 15248856 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry and posterior rhinomanometry as tools for inhalation challenge studies. Kesavanathan J, Swift DL, Fitzgerald TK, Permutt T, Bascom R. J Toxicol Environ Health; 1996 Jun 28; 48(3):295-307. PubMed ID: 8656451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of optical rhinometry to acoustic rhinometry using nasal provocation testing with Dermatophagoides farinae. Cheung EJ, Citardi MJ, Fakhri S, Cain J, Batra PS, Luong A. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Aug 28; 143(2):290-3. PubMed ID: 20647137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peak inspiratory flow rate is more sensitive than acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry in detecting corticosteroid response with nasal histamine challenge. Wilson AM, Sims EJ, Robb F, Cockburn W, Lipworth BJ. Rhinology; 2003 Mar 28; 41(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 12677735 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and the amount of nasal secretion in the clinical monitoring of the nasal provocation test. Pirilä T, Nuutinen J. Clin Exp Allergy; 1998 Apr 28; 28(4):468-77. PubMed ID: 9641574 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bilateral nasal allergen provocation monitored with acoustic rhinometry. Assessment of both nasal passages and the side reacting with greater congestion: relation to the nasal cycle. Gotlib T, Samoliński B, Grzanka A. Clin Exp Allergy; 2005 Mar 28; 35(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 15784109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of intranasal triamcinolone acetonide on bronchial hyper-responsiveness in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis and comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with acoustic rhinometric assessment. Oztürk F, Türktaş I, Asal K, Ileri F, Münevver Pinar N. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Aug 28; 68(8):1007-15. PubMed ID: 15236886 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective measurement of nasal airway dimensions using acoustic rhinometry: methodological and clinical aspects. Hilberg O. Allergy; 2002 Aug 28; 57 Suppl 70():5-39. PubMed ID: 11990714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of allergen provocation on the nasal cycle estimated by acoustic rhinometry. Kim JK, Cho JH, Jang HJ, Shim DB, Shin HA. Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Apr 28; 126(4):390-5. PubMed ID: 16608791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]