These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
191 related items for PubMed ID: 9346543
1. The rational development of liver allocation policy. Payne WD. Liver Transpl Surg; 1995 Jan; 1(1):58-61; discussion 80-2. PubMed ID: 9346543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A UNOS perspective on donor liver allocation. United Network for Organ Sharing. Bollinger RR. Liver Transpl Surg; 1995 Jan; 1(1):47-55; discussion 80-2. PubMed ID: 9346541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Who should get liver transplants?: as demand far outpaces donors, federal officials may revamp rules. Weiss R. Washington Post; 1996 Dec 09; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11648044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Who should receive the liver allograft: the transplant center or the recipient? Klintmalm GB. Liver Transpl Surg; 1995 Jan 09; 1(1):55-8; discussion 80-2. PubMed ID: 9346542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A critique of UNOS liver allocation policy. United Network for Organ Sharing. Himma KE. Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1999 Jan 09; 8(3):311-20. PubMed ID: 10388931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. National and local forces in organ allocation. Burdick JF. Transplant Proc; 1999 Jan 09; 31(1-2):1333-6. PubMed ID: 10083593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Federal payment for transplants for poor studied. Pear R. N Y Times Web; 1986 May 18; ():A1, A31. PubMed ID: 11647816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rethinking the national organ transplant program: when push comes to shove. Sten JA. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994 May 18; 11(1):197-219. PubMed ID: 10142391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]